• ↑↓ to navigate
  • Enter to open
  • to select
  • Ctrl + Alt + Enter to open in panel
  • Esc to dismiss
⌘ '
keyboard shortcuts

Refutation of Quranist Claims

Quranists

Quranists

Quranism (Arabic: القرآنية, romanized: al-Qurʾāniyya) is an Islamic denomination that generally rejects the authoritative role of hadiths, and considers the Quran to be the only dependable religious text. Quranist Muslims believe that the Quran is clear and complete and can be fully understood without recourse to external sources.

Quranists are often divided into two main branches: those who believe the Quran is the primary source and consider external sources such as the hadith, sunnah, and tradition as secondary and dependent, and those who accept no texts other than the Quran and disregard tradition altogether. The extent to which Quranists reject the authenticity of the sunnah varies, though the most established groups of Quranism have thoroughly criticised the hadith, the most prevalent being the Quranist claim that the hadith is not mentioned in the Quran as a source of Islamic theology or practise, was not recorded in written form until two centuries after the death of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, contains perceived errors and contradictions, and promotes sectarianism, anti-science, anti-reason, and misogyny. Quranists also believe that previous revelations of God have been altered, and that the Quran is the only book of God that has valid divine significance.

As they believe that hadith, while not being reliable sources of religion, can serve as historical records, Quranists cite some early Islamic writings in support of their positions, including those attributed to Muhammad, caliph Umar (r. 634–644) and materials dating to the Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates. Modern scholarship holds that controversy over the sufficiency of the Qur’an as the only source of Islamic law and doctrine dates back to the early centuries of Islam, where some scholars introduced followers of the Quran alone as Mu’tazilites or sects of the Kharijites, such as the Haroori and the Azariqa. Though the Quran-only view waned during the classical Islamic period, it re-emerged and thrived with the modernist thinkers of the 19th century in Egypt and the Indian subcontinent. Quranism has since taken on political, reformist, fundamentalist, and militant dimensions in various countries.

In matters of faith, jurisprudence, and legislation, Quranists differ from Ahl al-Hadith, who consider the hadith (Kutub al-Sittah) in addition to the Quran. Unlike the Sunni and Shia sects, the Quranist view argues that Islam can be practised without the hadith. Whereas hadith-followers believe that obedience to Muhammad entails obedience to hadiths, Quranists believe that obedience to Muhammad means obedience to the Qur’an. In addition, several extra-Qur’anic traditions upheld by Sunnis, such as kissing the Black Stone, the symbolic Stoning of the Devil, and the Tashahhud during the Salah, are regarded as idolatry (shirk) or possible idolatry by Quranists. This methodological difference has led to considerable divergence between Quranists and both Sunnis and Shias in matters of theology and law as well as the understanding of the Quran. Despite this, aspects of Quranism have been adopted by non-Quranists, such as some Shia reformist scholars.

wikipedia/en/QuranismWikipedia

Link to original

🔍 WHO ARE THE QURANISTS?

“Quranists” are individuals or sects who claim that:

“The Qur’an is complete, fully detailed, and self-sufficient as the only source of guidance; the Hadith are unnecessary and possibly fabricated.”

They often rely on modernist, rationalist, and sometimes ‘secular’ methodologies, sometimes influenced by colonial critiques of tradition or scientistic paradigms.


🧠 CHAIN OF THOUGHT: THREE DIMENSIONS OF THEIR IDEOLOGY

1. Epistemological Rejection of Sunnah

Quranists argue:

  • The Qur’an says “We have not neglected anything in the Book” (Qur’an 6:38), therefore it is complete.

  • Hadith were compiled long after the Prophet ﷺ died, and thus unreliable.

🔎 Refutation:

  • The Qur’an itself commands obedience to the Prophet ﷺ in over 40 verses.

“Obey Allah and obey the Messenger…”
Qur’an 4:59

  • The Sunnah is wahy ghayr matluww (non-recited revelation), as per:

“Nor does he speak from desire. It is but a revelation revealed.”
Qur’an 53:3–4


2. Rejection Of Ritual Sunnah (Ṣalāh, Zakāh, etc.)

Quranists often say:

“The Qur’an does not give detailed instructions on how to pray, fast, pay zakat, or perform Hajj — so we must reinterpret these.”

So they come up with:

  • Ṣalāh = meditation or mental connection

  • Zakāh = charitable values, not a set percentage

  • Hajj = symbolic pilgrimage of the heart

🧱 This contradicts:

  • The Ijmā‘ (scholarly consensus) on the Tawaṭur (mass transmission) of practices — i.e. the Prophetic Sunnah was lived, not just written.

E.g. the Qur’an says:

“Establish the prayer (aqīmū al-ṣalāh)” — but never says how.

The Prophet ﷺ said:

“Pray as you have seen me pray.”
(Bukhari 1 - 604)


🔥 LIST OF CORE QURANIST BELIEFS

BeliefDeviation from Islamic Tradition
Rejection of HadithIgnores transmitted Prophetic explanation
Redefinition of Prayer (Ṣalāh)No bowing, sujūd, or rak‘ah structure
Denial of Angels and JinnInterpreted metaphorically
No Hijab obligationClaimed to be cultural, not Qur’anic
No physical Resurrection or Hell“Spiritual” only, or allegorical
Moral Universalism over Divine LawSecular ethics override divine legislation
Reincarnation beliefMisreading of death/life verses
No Apostasy punishmentMisinterpreting freedom of belief
Fasting is optionalNo Sunnah clarification for suḥūr/iftār

🧱 THE ROOT PROBLEM: SECULAR EPISTEMOLOGY

Quranists fall into the trap of:

  • Desacralizing Revelation

  • Dividing Naqli (revealed) and ‘Aqli (rational) sciences

  • Assuming the Qur’an is like any book, not a revealed discourse that presupposes a living Prophetic interpreter.

In doing so, they often view Islam through:

  • Protestant paradigms (sola scriptura)
  • Western liberalism
  • Modernity’s emphasis on individualism and reason

This is precisely the crisis identified by al-Attas in Islam and Secularism — a severance of knowledge from its metaphysical foundations.

🔚 CONCLUSION

Quranist beliefs are not simply alternative “interpretations.” They are a methodological rupture from the entire Islamic tradition: in theology (Aqīdah), law (Fiqh), linguistics (Balāghah), and spirituality (Tazkiyyah). Their positions collapse when subjected to:

  1. Tafsir from early generations
  2. Qur’anic internal consistency
  3. Mass-transmitted Prophetic practice

❌ QURANISTS WORLDVIEW ON LIFE AND DEATH

Refutation

Quranists justify belief in reincarnation using verses like 2:28, misreading them through speculative ta’wīl, mystical syncretism, or as a consequence of rejecting hadith. However, these interpretations deviate from the classical tafsīr tradition and the tawhīdī worldview, which affirm a linear eschatology, one earthly life, and a final resurrection.

1. Linguistic Ambiguity Misinterpretation Path

Quranists often base their beliefs on hyper-literal readings or speculative interpretations of isolated verses, without reference to:

  • Asbāb al-Nuzūl (occasions of revelation)

  • Tafsīr al-Ma’thūr (transmitted exegesis)

  • Fiqh of context (Maqāṣid and Usul)

They take verses with ambiguous vocabulary and try to force metaphysical ideas. For example:

“How can you disbelieve in Allah when you were lifeless and He gave you life; then He will cause you to die, then He will bring you back to life, and then to Him you will be returned?”
Qur’an 2:28

They argue:

  • “You were dead” → pre-existent soul

  • “Then life” → current life

  • “Then death” → current death

  • “Then life again”this, they claim, proves reincarnation.

Response: This interpretation ignores the classical tafāsīr, which interpret this as referring to:

  • Creation from non-existence

  • Earthly life

  • Barzakh (intermediary stage)

  • Resurrection on Yawm al-Qiyāmah

So, it’s not a cycle of souls but a linear ontological timeline — non-existence → life → death → afterlife.

2. Philosophical Syncretism Path

Some Quranists are influenced by Vedantic or Neoplatonic thought, sometimes without realizing it. This happens through exposure to:

  • New Age spirituality

  • Sufism distorted by perennialism

  • Self-help movements (e.g., Eckhart Tolle, Deepak Chopra)

They read verses like:

“And you will certainly know it after a while.”
Qur’an 38:88

or

“Every soul shall taste death…”
Qur’an 3:185

…then speculate that “tasting death” multiple times implies multiple lives. They adopt a ta’wīl (esoteric) reading that is disconnected from the tafsīr of Ibn Kathīr, Qurtubī, etc.

Response: Philosophically, the Qur’an presents a linear eschatology, unlike the cyclical cosmology of reincarnation (tanāsukh or metempsychosis). There’s no concept of “soul learning through repeated lives.” Accountability is once.

“Every soul will be compensated for what it earned, and none will be wronged.”
Qur’an 3:161

3. Hadith Rejection Path

Since reincarnation is clearly denied by hadith, Quranists must reject the Prophetic clarifications to promote their theory. For example:

The Prophet ﷺ said:
“There is no soul except that its place in Paradise or Hell has already been assigned.”
(Bukhari 1 - 320)

They discard such texts because they insist on Qur’an-alone theology, rejecting the need for Sunnah as Revelation (Wahy Ghayr Matluww).

But the Qur’an itself says:

“Whatever the Messenger gives you – take it; and what he forbids you – refrain from it.”
Qur’an 59:7

So, using Qur’an to reject the Sunnah is circular and self-defeating.

✅ ISLAMIC WORLDVIEW ON LIFE AND DEATH

Islamic epistemology affirms a one-time earthly life, followed by:

  1. Death

  2. Barzakh (intermediate realm)

  3. Resurrection on the Day of Judgment

  4. Judgment and Eternal Afterlife

This is echoed repeatedly:

“Then after that you will surely die. Then you will surely be resurrected on the Day of Judgment.”
Qur’an 23:15–16

❌ FLAWS IN THE REINCARNATION THEORY

  • Contradicts Divine Justice: If souls get infinite chances, accountability is meaningless.
  • Undermines Tawhīd: Suggests an impersonal, karmic universe rather than willful Divine Qadr.
  • Negates purpose of Prophethood: If all souls evolve on their own, why reveal Qur’an?