Sign (semiotics)
In Semiotics, a sign is anything that communicates a meaning that is not the sign itself to the interpreter of the sign. The meaning can be intentional, as when a word is uttered with a specific meaning, or unintentional, as when a symptom is taken as a sign of a particular medical condition. Signs can communicate through any of the senses, visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory, or taste.
Two major theories describe the way signs acquire the ability to transfer information. Both theories understand the defining property of the sign as a relation between a number of elements. In semiology, the tradition of semiotics developed by Ferdinand de Saussure (1857–1913), the sign relation is dyadic, consisting only of a form of the sign (the signifier) and its meaning (the signified). Saussure saw this relation as being essentially arbitrary (the principle of semiotic arbitrariness), motivated only by social convention. Saussure’s theory has been particularly influential in the study of linguistic signs. The other major semiotic theory, developed by Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914), defines the sign as a triadic relation as “something that stands for something, to someone in some capacity”. This means that a sign is a relation between the sign vehicle (the specific physical form of the sign), a sign object (the aspect of the world that the sign carries meaning about) and an interpretant (the meaning of the sign as understood by an interpreter). According to Peirce, signs can be divided by the type of relation that holds the sign relation together as either icons, indices or symbols. Icons are those signs that signify by means of similarity between sign vehicle and sign object (e.g. a portrait or map), indices are those that signify by means of a direct relation of contiguity or causality between sign vehicle and sign object (e.g. a symptom), and symbols are those that signify through a law or arbitrary social convention.
Saussure’s theory of signs, central to semiotics and structuralism, proposes that a sign consists of a signifier (the physical form, like a word or image) and a signified (the concept or meaning it represents). The relationship between these two is arbitrary, meaning there’s no inherent connection between the signifier and the signified. Meaning arises from the system of differences between signs, rather than inherent qualities of the sign itself.
- Signifier and Signified: Saussure argued that all signs, including words, images, and gestures, are composed of a signifier (the physical form) and a signified (the concept or meaning it represents). For example, the word “tree” (the signifier) represents the concept of a large plant with a woody trunk (the signified).
- Arbitrariness of the Sign: Saussure emphasized that the link between the signifier and signified is arbitrary, meaning there’s no natural or logical connection between them. For example, there’s nothing about the sound of “tree” that necessitates it refers to a plant with a woody trunk, wikipedia/en/Sign_(semiotics)
. This arbitrariness is key to the flexibility and creativity of language, allowing us to create new signs and meanings. - **Structuralism and Meaning:Saussure’s theory is rooted in [structuralism], which emphasizes the relationships between elements within a system rather than the individual elements themselves. Meaning is not inherent in the sign itself, but rather arises from its position within the system of signs. For example, the meaning of “tree” is determined by its relationship to other words like “bush,” “flower,” and “plant,” according to SSRN.
- **Sign Systems: Saussure’s work extends beyond language to encompass other systems of signs, such as visual communication, fashion, and even cultural practices. His theory provides a framework for analyzing how any system of signs conveys meaning.
- **Semiotics: Saussure’s work laid the foundation for the field of semiotics, the study of signs and symbols and their meaning. Semiotics examines how signs are created, interpreted, and used in different contexts.
Saussure’s theory of [arbitrary signs] posits that the relationship between a signifier (the sound-image or word) and a signified (the concept) is fundamentally arbitrary and lacks a natural or inherent connection. This means there’s no logical reason why a specific word refers to a particular object or concept.
Elaboration:
-
**Arbitrariness: Saussure argued that the link between a signifier and its signified is not determined by any inherent properties of the referent or by any physical resemblance. For example, there’s no reason why the word “cat” is linked to the animal, other than a social convention.
-
**Sign as a Two-Sided Entity: Saussure viewed the sign as a psychological entity composed of two parts: the signifier (sound-image or word) and the signified (the concept or idea). These two elements are joined by an associative bond, which is itself arbitrary.
-
**Signifier and [Signified]: The signifier is the sound-image or written form of the word, while the signified is the concept or meaning associated with it.
-
**Social Convention: Saussure emphasized that meaning is derived from social convention, not from any natural connection between the signifier and the signified. This means that the meaning of a sign is determined by the rules and conventions of a language community.
-
**Exceptions Onomatopoeia: While most signs are arbitrary, Saussure acknowledged the existence of onomatopoeic words (like “boom,” “splash”) which partially mimic the sound of the concept. However, even these words are subject to social conventions and can vary across languages.
-
Semiotics and Language: Saussure’s theory of arbitrary signs is a cornerstone of semiotics and linguistics. It highlights the importance of convention, context, and meaning-making in communication.