Existence of God
Arguments for God’s existence are diverse, often categorized as philosophical, moral, experiential, or pragmatic. They aim to provide rational, experiential, or practical grounds for belief in a divine being.
Philosophical Arguments
- **Ontological Argumentvery concept of God as the greatest conceivable being necessitates existence, as existence is a perfection. (Anselm, Gödel)
- Cosmological argument: General argument that everything contingent requires a cause, leading to a necessary first cause (God) to avoid infinite regress. (Aquinas’ “Third Way” is related)
- First Cause Argument: A core aspect of the Cosmological Argument, emphasizing the need for an uncaused initial cause of all existence.
- **Teleological Argument: Points to perceived order, purpose, and complexity in the universe (especially in biology) as evidence of an intelligent designer (God). (Paley, Intelligent Design)
- **Kalam Cosmological Argument: 1) Whatever begins to exist has a cause; 2) The universe began to exist; 3) Therefore, the universe has a cause (identified as God). (al-Ghazali, Craig)
- **Argument from Contingency: Contingent beings (those that might not have existed) require a necessary being (God) as their ultimate ground of existence. (Aquinas’ “Third Way”)
- **Argument from degree degrees of perfection (goodness, truth) in things, arguing these imply a maximum standard or ultimate perfection (God). (Aquinas’ “Fourth Way”)
- Trademark Argument: Suggests the idea of God within us is so profound it must have been placed there by God, like a craftsman’s mark. (Descartes)
- **Gödel’s Ontological Proofatical-logical version of the ontological argument attempting to prove God’s existence necessarily follows from defined axioms.
- Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (TAG): Asserts that logic, science, or morality presuppose the existence of God as their necessary precondition. (Presuppositional Apologetics)
- Argument from Reason: Claims that human rationality and the reliability of reason cannot be adequately explained by naturalistic processes, implying a rational ground (God).
- Argument from Consciousness: Proposes that the existence and nature of subjective consciousness point towards a conscious, intentional creator (God).
- Meinongian Argument: Argues that non-existent objects (like fictional characters) have a form of being, and God’s “non-existence” would be contradictory in a way that necessitates existence.
Moral Arguments
- Moral Argument: Posits that the existence of objective moral values, duties, or human moral awareness necessitates a transcendent moral lawgiver (God). (Lewis, Craig)
- Argument from Love: Suggests that the human capacity for selfless love (agape) points towards a source of perfect love (God).
- Natural-law Argument: Asserts that objective moral principles are discoverable through reason in nature, implying a divine lawgiver who established this order.
Experiential Arguments
- Argument from Religious Experience: Claims widespread, profound personal experiences interpreted as encounters with the divine constitute evidence for God’s reality.
- Argument from Miracles: Points to events seemingly defying natural laws (e.g., healings, revelations) as evidence of divine intervention.
- Argument from Aesthetic Experience (Argument from Beauty): Proposes that the human perception of profound beauty, awe, and sublimity in nature or art points to a transcendent source of beauty (God).
Other Arguments / Pragmatic & Theological
- Pascal’s Wager: A pragmatic argument that belief in God is rational because the potential infinite reward (heaven) outweighs the finite cost of belief, even if God’s existence is uncertain.
- Argument from Desire: Argues that innate human longings for ultimate joy, meaning, or transcendence (which finite things cannot satisfy) suggest a real, corresponding object (God). (Lewis)
- Christological Argument: Focuses specifically on the person, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ as historical evidence for the existence of the Christian God.
- Lewis’s Trilemma: Argues that Jesus’ claims to divinity leave only three options: Lunatic, Liar, or Lord (God), with “Lord” being the most plausible.
- Reformed epistemology: God can be “properly basic” (rational without evidence) due to innate human cognitive faculties designed for this belief. (Plantinga)
- Argument from Providence: Points to perceived guidance, purpose, or “coincidences” in individual lives or history as evidence of divine orchestration. (Implied in many experiential/narrative approaches)
- Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism: Claims that if naturalism and evolution are true, our cognitive faculties are selected for survival, not truth, undermining our trust in them (including the belief in naturalism/evolution) - indirectly supporting theism. (Plantinga)
Cosmological argument
-
**Aquinas’ First Way — Unmoved movernas’s Parasitic Cosmological Argument]] (MacDonald 1991)
-
Samuel Clarke-style Cosmological Argument
-
Davis-Craig Leibnizian Argument
-
Pruss Leibnizian Argument
-
Cosmological Argument without Principle of sufficient reason
-
Koons’ Cosmological Argument
-
Pruss and Rasmussen’s Contingency Argument
-
Emanuel Rutten’s Atomistic Cosmological Argument
-
**Kalam Cosmological Argument (2019) on Causation]]
-
Alexander Pruss’ Kalam Argument
-
Swinburne’s Inductive Cosmological Argument
Ontological arguments
23a. Anselm’s Second Ontological Argument (Proslogion III)
23b. Hartshorne on Proslogion III
23c. Maydole’s Reconstruction
- Plantinga’s Modal Ontological Argument
- Gödel’s Ontological Argument — Demonstration of Possibility
- Alexander Pruss’ Improvement on Gödel
- Robert Maydole’s Modal Perfection Argument
Design arguments, Aquinas’ Fifth Way
Fine-tuning arguments
41b. Collins on Fine-Tuning
42. Collins’ Fine-tuning for discoverability
Moral arguments
- Argument from Objectivity of Morality
- Evil as Privation of Good
- Pruss’ lecture
- Moral Knowledge Argument
Experiential arguments
- Plantinga on Proper functionalism
- Felipe Leon interview
- Alston on Perceiving God (Part 1)
- NDEs as Evidence
Arguments from miracles
- Resurrection of Jesus as Historical Evidence
Metaphysical arguments
- [[E. J. Lowe|Lowe’s Argument from Abstract Objects
- Feser’s Augustinian Proof
- Rasmussen’s Argument from Limits
Nomological arguments
- Swinburne’s Argument from simplicity
Axiological arguments
Noological arguments
Linguistic arguments
- Falsity of Semantic Indeterminism
Anthropological arguments
Pragmatic arguments
— General Comments on Pascal’s Wager
Meta-arguments
Probability assessment & Nature of arguments
— Oppy on Soundness Conditions
— Felipe Leon: 100+ Arguments for Atheism
- Material Causality Objection to Theism – Critique that creation ex nihilo violates metaphysical principles of material causality.
- Modified Meager Moral Fruits Argument (MMMFA) – A sociological argument that religion fails to produce moral outcomes on an institutional scale.
- Draper’s Meager Moral Fruits Argument – Probabilistic argument that religious believers show no greater moral behavior than non-believers.
- Oppy’s Worldview Comparison Framework – Epistemological critique of derivational argumentation in favor of holistic worldview coherence.
- Weak Principle of Material Causality (Weak PMC) – A modal form of material causality often used in cosmological arguments for naturalism.
- Feser’s Augustinian Proof – Argument for theism based on the metaphysical status of abstract objects.
- Chandler’s Divine Intervention Argument – Bayesian evaluation of specific interventions attributed to God.
- Collins’ Fine-Tuning for Discoverability – Variant of the fine-tuning argument that emphasizes the cognitive accessibility of the universe.
- Rasmussen’s Argument from Limits – Metaphysical argument proposing that reality must culminate in a necessary being without arbitrary limits.
- Swinburne’s Argument from Induction – Teleological argument linking the uniformity of laws of nature with divine simplicity.
Resources
- wikipedia/en/Category:Arguments_for_the_existence_of_God
- wikipedia/en/Natural_Theology_or_Evidences_of_the_Existence_and_Attributes_of_the_Deity
(Paley)
- wikipedia/en/The_Only_Possible_Argument_in_Support_of_a_Demonstration_of_the_Existence_of_God
(Kant)
- wikipedia/en/Is_There_a_God%3F
(Swinburne)
- wikipedia/en/Nyayakusumanjali
(Udayana - Hindu Nyaya arguments for God)
- wikipedia/en/Proof_of_the_Truthful
(Avicenna - Islamic Cosmological Argument)
- wikipedia/en/Seddiqin_argument
(Mulla Sadra - Islamic argument combining ontology & causality)
- Majesty of Reason (Joe Schmid)
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (SEP entries)
- Philosophical Disquisitions analyses
- Real Atheology debates
- Majesty of Reason YouTube Channel
- MoR – Argument from Change Playlist
- MoR – Contingency Argument Playlist
- MoR – Kalam Cosmological Argument Playlist
- MoR – Ontological Argument Playlist
- MoR – Moral Argument Playlist
- MoR – God and Abstract Objects Playlist
- youtube/v=lEvlWCW55NY
- The Free Will Show YouTube Channel
- youtube/v=NNijmxsKGbc
- MacDonald (1991) – Aquinas’s Parasitic Cosmological Argument
- Tomaszewski (2016) – drive.google.com/139_6-j-SnKKcfF2J9VPJIxWss0fEBWNg
- Gale & Pruss (1999) – A New Cosmological Argument
- Oppy (2000) – drive.google.com/1w2fBD6Lv71dFocyxwOuKyQWEge3kPckT
- Sinhababu (2016) – Divine Fine-Tuning vs. Electrons in Love
- Heathwood (2012) – Could Morality Have a Source?
- Turri (2008) – Alston’s Perceiving God
- Cross – Critique of Plantinga’s EAAN
- Climenhaga & Rubio (forthcoming) – Molinism: Explaining Our Freedom Away
- Smith (2019) – Common Consent Argument for Nature Spirits
- Oppy (2015) – drive.google.com/1OmD1ecbqp_hNsKfO4SMXZsM101RGZ19p
- Schmid – drive.google.com/1vJ4UVr70lGxn4nhMhtgXzeBUKtz71Ocx
- Nagasawa (2017) – Maximal God: A New Defense of Perfect Being Theism
- Sudduth (2016) – Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival
- Bergmann & Kain (2014) – Challenges to Moral and Religious Belief
-
- MoR Blog – Existential Inertia Analysis
- Philosophical Disquisitions – William Lane Craig on Morality and Meaning
- Felipe Leon (Exapologist Blog) – 200+ Arguments for Atheism
- Resurrection Critical Appraisals – docs.google.com/1OU[...]PEA
- Schieber vs. Rauser – youtube/v=1D-PKl-QgdI
- Hudson – youtube/v=w6qWzxKVBko
- Alexander Pruss – Privation Theory of Evil
- Crummett – youtube/v=auahudU1C08
Key Gaps in Prior Coverage
- Anti-Theistic Arguments: 200+ atheistic arguments from (e.g., “Argument from Ugliness,” “Quantum Modal Realism for Naturalism”) were not integrated. ex-apologist: 200 (or so) Arguments for Atheism
- Critiques of Classical Theism: Material causality and moral fruit arguments challenge core theistic claims. ex-apologist: Theism and Material Causality, philosophy of religion | The Philosophy Corner
- Methodological Debates: Oppy’s rejection of derivations critiques how philosophical arguments are constructed. What Derivations Cannot Do, Oppy on arguments and worldviews: an internal critique | International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
- Institutional Critiques: MMMFA targets religious institutions—absent from individual-focused moral arguments. philosophy of religion | The Philosophy Corner
💡 Summary: 25+ arguments/resources were missed, primarily targeting theistic metaphysics, moral outcomes, and methodological foundations. The resource list consolidates 80+ links for further exploration.