Non-sovereign monarchy
A Non-sovereign monarchy, subnational monarchy or constituent monarchy is one in which the head of the monarchical polity (whether a geographic territory or an ethnic group), and the polity itself, are subject to a temporal authority higher than their own. The constituent states of the German Empire or the princely states of the Indian Empire during British rule provide historical examples; while the Zulu king, whose power derives from the Constitution of South Africa, is a contemporary one.
A tribal monarchy is a form of government where a chief or king rules over a tribe or a group of related tribes, often with a hereditary or elective succession. It represents a more basic or early form of monarchy, predating the development of more complex state structures. While the term “monarch” can be applied, it’s sometimes debated whether tribal chiefs should be considered monarchs in the same way as heads of state in larger, more established nations.
- Tribal Governance: Tribal societies often have a hierarchical structure, with a leader or chief at the top.
- Hereditary or Elective: The position of tribal chief can be hereditary, passed down through a family lineage, or it can be elective, with members of the tribe choosing their leader.
- Basic Monarchy: A tribal monarchy is considered a fundamental or basic form of monarchy, often preceding the development of more complex political systems and states.
- Not Always a State: Not all tribal societies are considered states. Some tribal groups may lack the characteristics of a state, such as defined borders, a centralized government, or a formal legal system.
- Examples: Examples of tribal monarchies can be found in various parts of the world, including some indigenous communities and historical societies. For example, the Chittagong Hill Tracts in Bangladesh has a system of three tribal circles with hereditary rulers, according to Wikipedia.