Hadith
Hadith is a form of Islamic oral tradition containing the purported words, actions, and the silent approvals of the prophet Muhammad. Each hadith is associated with a chain of narrators (a lineage of people who reportedly heard and repeated the hadith, from which the source of the hadith can apparently be traced). Compilations of hadith were aggregated into distinct collections by Islamic scholars (known as Muhaddiths) in the centuries after Muhammad’s death. Hadith are widely respected in mainstream Muslim thought and are central to Islamic law. They are at the center of a major scholarly discipline in Islam known as the hadith sciences, in addition to a contemporary field of historiography known as hadith studies.
Ḥadīth is the Arabic word for things like a report or an account (of an event).: 471 For many, the authority of hadith is a source for religious and moral guidance known as Sunnah, which ranks second only to that of the Quran (which Muslims hold to be the word of God revealed to Muhammad). While the number of verses pertaining to law in the Quran is relatively small, hadith are considered by many to give direction on everything from details of religious obligations (such as Ghusl or Wudu, ablutions for salat prayer), to the correct forms of salutations and the importance of benevolence to slaves. Thus for many, the “great bulk” of the rules of Sharia are derived from hadith, rather than the Quran. Among scholars of Sunni Islam the term hadith may include not only the words, advice, practices, etc. of Muhammad, but also those of his companions. In Shia Islam, hadith are the embodiment of the sunnah, the words and actions of Muhammad and his family, the Ahl al-Bayt (The Twelve Imams and Muhammad’s daughter, Fatimah).
Unlike the Quran, not all Muslims believe that all hadith accounts are divine revelation; in fact, scholars have thoroughly examined hadith to sort them into accuracy categories ever since the early period following the Prophet Muhammad’s death. Different collections of hadīth would come to differentiate the different branches of the Islamic faith. A minority of Muslims believe that Islamic guidance should be based on the Quran only, thus rejecting the authority of hadith; some further claim that many hadiths are fabrications (pseudepigrapha) created in the 8th and 9th centuries AD, and which are falsely attributed to Muhammad. Historically, some sects of the Kharijites also rejected the hadiths, while Mu’tazilites rejected the hadiths as the basis for Islamic law, while at the same time accepting the Sunnah and Ijma.
Because some hadith contain questionable and contradictory statements, the authentication of hadith became a major Islamic discipline known as the hadith sciences. In its classic form a hadith consists of two parts—the chain of narrators who have transmitted the report (the isnad), and the main text of the report (the matn). Individual hadith are classified by Muslim clerics and jurists into categories such as sahih (‘authentic’), hasan (‘good’), or da’if (‘weak’). However, different groups and different scholars may classify a hadith differently. Historically, some hadiths deemed to be unreliable were still used by Sunni jurists for non-core areas of law.
Western scholars participating in the field of hadith studies are generally skeptical of the value of hadith for understanding the true historical Muhammad, even those considered sahih by Muslim scholars. Among other reasons, this is due to the late date for when the hadith compilations were made, difficulties in verifying their chains of transmission, the prevalence of falsified hadith, and skepticism concerning whether the methods of the hadith sciences can reliably discriminate between authentic and inauthentic hadith.
Hadith refers to the recorded sayings, actions, approvals, and characteristics of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. It forms the second most authoritative source of Islam after the Qur’an, and is foundational for the development of Fiqh, Aqidah, Tafsir, and the entire edifice of Islamic knowledge.
📚 Core Concepts
- Sunnah — the lived tradition of the Prophet ﷺ, distinct from but embodied in Hadith
- Hadith Qudsi — divine speech conveyed through the Prophet, distinct from Qur’an
- Isnad — the chain of transmission that determines authenticity
- Matn — the actual content of the hadith
- Sahih, Hasan, Da’if — classification of Hadith based on reliability
- Mutawatir vs Ahad — epistemic weight of transmission routes
- Jarh wa Ta’dil — science of evaluating narrators
🧠 Sciences of Hadith
🕸️ Hadith and Other Disciplines
- In Usul al-Fiqh — used as dalil with different epistemic weights
- In Tafsir — especially via tafsir bil-ma’thur
- In Sira — forms the raw material for prophetic biography
- In Islamic Ethics — applied source for akhlaq and adab
- In Fiqh — post-Qur’anic elaboration of rulings
⚠️ Polemical and Orientalist Claims
- Hadith Fabrication — critiques and responses
- Hadith Collection Timeline — refutations of “200-year delay”
- Sunnah not written like Qur’an — addressed in Defense of Hadith Compilation
- Criticism of Bukhari and Muslim
- Aisha’s Hadith Literacy
- Women Narrators in Hadith
An example of a valid hadith that was applicable at a specific time but cannot be followed in our current context due to changes in circumstances, rulings, or abrogation is the hadith regarding the prohibition of storing sacrificial meat during Eid al-Adha.
Hadith: Prohibition of Storing Sacrificial Meat
Narration:
Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (may Allah be pleased with him) reported:
The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said:
“I had prohibited you from eating the sacrificial meat beyond three days, so eat it, and keep it as you like, and give it in charity.”
(Sahih Muslim, 1971)
Context And Explanation:
-
Background of the Hadith:
- Initially, the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) prohibited people from storing the meat of sacrificial animals during Eid al-Adha for more than three days.
- This prohibition was contextual because there was a severe famine, and the Prophet (ﷺ) wanted the excess sacrificial meat to be shared with those in need.
-
Change of Ruling:
- Later, the Prophet (ﷺ) abrogated this ruling when circumstances changed. He explicitly stated that people were allowed to eat, store, and distribute the sacrificial meat as they liked.
- The initial prohibition was due to temporary needs (famine and the necessity to ensure fairness in distributing food).
-
Current Status:
- This hadith demonstrates the contextual nature of certain rulings in Islam. Once the famine ended, the prohibition was lifted, and the ruling returned to its original permissibility.
Lessons From the Hadith:
-
Principle of Contextual Rulings:
- Some rulings in Islam are based on specific situations or conditions. When those conditions cease to exist, the ruling may no longer be applicable.
- This showcases the flexibility and pragmatism of Islamic law (Shariah).
-
Understanding Abrogation (Naskh):
- This hadith is a prime example of how certain laws or guidelines can be temporarily applicable and later abrogated or modified.
- It highlights the importance of considering historical context and scholarly interpretation when implementing Islamic rulings.
-
Intent Behind Rulings:
- The Prophet (ﷺ) prohibited storing meat to fulfill a social need (feeding the poor during a time of famine). This reflects the ethical foundation of Islamic rulings, which prioritize justice and communal well-being.
General Principle:
This hadith demonstrates that valid rulings from the time of the Prophet (ﷺ) may not always be applicable in different contexts. Such rulings require careful analysis of their:
- Historical context
- Purpose (Maqasid)
- Current applicability based on evolving circumstances
The hadith you are referring to emphasizes the sanctity of a Muslim’s blood compared to that of the Ka’bah. It is narrated by Abdullah ibn Umar, who reported that he saw the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) performing tawaf around the Ka’bah. During this act, the Prophet expressed his admiration for the Ka’bah’s purity and sanctity, but then stated:
“By Him in Whose hand is Muhammad’s soul, the sanctity of a believer’s blood and property in the sight of Allah is greater than your sanctity.”
This hadith highlights that while the Ka’bah holds immense significance in Islam, the life and property of a believer are regarded as even more sacred in the eyes of Allah
The source of this narration can be found in various Islamic texts, including:
- Sunan Ibn Majah (Hadith 3932), where it is classified as Sahih li ghayrihi (authentic due to external evidence).
- Targhib wa’ l-Tarhib of Imam al-Mundhiri.
- Other compilations like those by al-Bayhaqi and Tirmidhi, which also discuss similar themes regarding the sanctity of a Muslim’s life and property
- Periodic table of hadith sources
Ilm al-Rijal
Biographical evaluation (Arabic: عِلْمُ الرِّجال, romanized: Ilm al-Rijāl), literally meaning ‘Knowledge of Men’ but more commonly understood as the Science of Narration, refers to a discipline of Islamic religious studies within hadith terminology in which the narrators of hadith are evaluated. Its goal is to distinguish authentic and reliable hadiths from unreliable hadiths in establishing the credibility of the narrators, using both historic and religious knowledge. Ilm ar-rijal is synonymous with what is commonly referred to as al-jarḥ wa al-taʻdīl (discrediting and accrediting) – the criticism and declared acceptance of hadith narrators.
This incident is recorded in Sahih Muslim, one of the most authentic collections of hadith.
The Incident
The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) once passed by some people who were pollinating palm trees. He asked about what they were doing and then suggested that perhaps it would be better if they didn’t do it[5]. The companions, out of respect for the Prophet, followed his suggestion and stopped pollinating the trees. As a result, the date crop that year was poor[5].
The Prophet’s Response
When the Prophet (peace be upon him) was informed about the reduced yield, he said:
“If it is one of the matters of your religion, then refer to me. But if it is one of the matters of your worldly affairs, then you have better knowledge of it[5].”
In another version, he is reported to have said:
“I am only human. When I command you regarding religion, adhere to it. But when I give an opinion, I am only human[7].”
Understanding the Hadith
This hadith provides several important lessons:
- Distinction between religious and worldly matters: The Prophet (peace be upon him) clearly differentiated between religious guidance, which is infallible, and his personal opinions on worldly matters, which were subject to human limitations[7].
- Humility: By acknowledging his mistake, the Prophet (peace be upon him) demonstrated great humility and set an example for his followers[7].
- Encouragement of expertise: This incident encourages Muslims to seek and respect expertise in various fields, rather than blindly following opinions, even from respected figures[7].
- Critical thinking: It teaches the importance of using reason and experience in worldly affairs, while following divine guidance in religious matters[7].
Scholarly Interpretation
Imam Nawawi, a renowned Islamic scholar, commented on this hadith, stating that it shows the companions were more knowledgeable about certain worldly matters, while the Prophet’s authority was absolute in religious affairs[7].
This hadith does not conflict with the Quranic guidance against speaking without knowledge (Al-Isra: 36). Rather, it demonstrates the Prophet’s honesty and willingness to correct himself when necessary, even in matters outside the realm of divine revelation[7].
In conclusion, this hadith serves as a valuable lesson in distinguishing between religious authority and human expertise, encouraging Muslims to think critically and seek knowledge in all aspects of life.
Citations:
[2] https://www.abuaminaelias.com/dailyhadithonline/2015/01/20/dua-hamd-trees-paradise/
[3] https://muslimmatters.org/2017/12/20/trees-a-forgotten-miracle/
[4] https://www.usuli.org/2023/12/08/parable-of-the-palm-tree-morality-as-the-language-of-deceit/
[5] https://islam.stackexchange.com/questions/51784/wrong-explanation-about-science-by-prophet-muhammad
[6] https://www.abuaminaelias.com/dailyhadithonline/2012/11/24/plant-tree-ressurection/
[8] https://www.iium.edu.my/deed/hadith/bukhari/039_sbt.html
Implications of Believing the Prophet Did Not Have Perfect Knowledge of Everything
This hadith has been widely commented upon by Islamic scholars as it raises critical theological considerations about the Prophet’s role and scope of knowledge.
1. The Scope of the Prophet’s Knowledge
- Religious Knowledge (Divinely Revealed): The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) had perfect and complete knowledge in all matters of religion. His guidance in this realm is infallible, as it originates from Allah through revelation.
- Worldly Knowledge (Human Experience): This incident underscores the human aspect of the Prophet. In worldly matters that are not tied to divine revelation, he exercised ijtihad (independent reasoning), which, while guided by divine wisdom, did not equate to infallibility in mundane affairs.
Scholarly Opinions:
- Imam Nawawi: Emphasized that the Prophet was sent to guide in religious matters and that worldly matters requiring empirical knowledge (such as agriculture) were left to human expertise.
- Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Pointed out that the Prophet’s acknowledgment of his human limitations in such matters reflects humility and a distinction between prophetic authority and human judgment.
2. Key Theological Considerations
- Belief in the Prophet’s Perfection:
- The Prophet (peace be upon him) is perfect in the execution of his divinely appointed role.
- Acknowledging his human limitations in mundane matters does not detract from his status as the final Messenger but instead emphasizes his relatability and humanity.
- Divine Guidance in Religious Affairs:
- The Quran confirms the Prophet’s divine guidance in religious matters: “He does not speak from desire; it is nothing but revelation revealed.” (Quran 53:3-4)
- Human Aspect of the Prophet:
- The hadith underscores the Prophet’s dual role as a messenger of divine knowledge and a human being who lived among his followers.
- Allah’s wisdom in this duality lies in making the Prophet a practical role model, relatable to ordinary human beings.
Broader Implications
- Tawhid: By recognizing that even the Prophet (peace be upon him) does not hold infinite knowledge in worldly affairs, Muslims reaffirm Allah’s exclusive omniscience and omnipotence.
- The Role of Revelation vs. Reason: This incident delineates the complementary roles of revelation and reason in Islam, encouraging Muslims to integrate both in their lives.
Remaining Questions for Reflection:
- How does acknowledging the Prophet’s human aspect help in understanding his role as a guide in both spiritual and worldly matters?
- What can be learned from this incident about the boundaries of religious authority and expertise in other fields?
When referencing a Hadith, the ‘Ulama sometimes mention the phrase: “muttafaqun ‘alayh” متفق عليه (agreed upon)
When the Hadith Masters use this term, it means that the Hadith in question is found in both books; Sahih Bukhari & Sahih Muslim, on the authority of the same Sahabi (radiyallahu’anhu) even if there exists variation in the wording.
Narrated by Burayda ibn al-Husayb (may Allah be pleased with him). He reported that the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) sent Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) to Khalid ibn al-Walid to bring the Khumus (one-fifth of the war booty). Burayda mentioned that he harbored dislike for Ali. He observed that Ali had taken a bath after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus. Burayda expressed his disapproval to Khalid. Upon returning to the Prophet and mentioning this incident, the Prophet said:
“O Burayda! Do you hate Ali?”
Burayda replied, “Yes.”
The Prophet then said, “Do not hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumus.”
This hadith is recorded in Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith 4350.
This narration highlights the Prophet’s allowance for Ali to sleep with other women as long as it’s halal. He and Fatima may Allah be pleased with her were not happy that Ali wanted to marry the daughter of Abu Jahal the man who threw camel guts on her father and she had to clean it. It would hurt her. Context is everything.
It was narrated from al-Miswar ibn Makhramah that ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib proposed marriage to the daughter of Abu Jahl, when he was already married to Faatimah, the daughter of the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him).
When Faatimah heard about that, she went to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and said to him: Your people are saying that you do not get angry for the sake of your daughters, and ‘Ali is going to marry the daughter of Abu Jahl.
Al-Miswar said: The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) stood up and I heard him when he bore witness, then he said: “I gave a daughter of mine in marriage to Abu’l-‘Aas ibn ar-Rabee‘; when he spoke he told me the truth and when he made me a promise he fulfilled his promise. Faatimah is a part of me, and whatever hurts her hurts me. By Allah, the daughter of the Messenger of Allah and the daughter of the enemy of Allah will not be joined together as wives of one man.”
So ‘Ali abandoned that proposal.
Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 3110; Muslim, 2449.
حَدَّثَنَا الْحَسَنُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا الْحَجَّاجُ، عَنِ ابْنِ جُرَيْجٍ، قَالَ زَعَمَ عَطَاءٌ أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ عُبَيْدَ بْنَ عُمَيْرٍ، يَقُولُ سَمِعْتُ عَائِشَةَ، تَزْعُمُ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم كَانَ يَمْكُثُ عِنْدَ زَيْنَبَ بِنْتِ جَحْشٍ، وَيَشْرَبُ عِنْدَهَا عَسَلاً، فَتَوَاصَيْتُ أَنَا وَحَفْصَةُ أَنَّ أَيَّتَنَا دَخَلَ عَلَيْهَا النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَلْتَقُلْ إِنِّي أَجِدُ مِنْكَ رِيحَ مَغَافِيرَ، أَكَلْتَ مَغَافِيرَ فَدَخَلَ عَلَى إِحْدَاهُمَا فَقَالَتْ ذَلِكَ لَهُ. فَقَالَ ” لاَ بَلْ شَرِبْتُ عَسَلاً عِنْدَ زَيْنَبَ بِنْتِ جَحْشٍ، وَلَنْ أَعُودَ لَهُ ”. فَنَزَلَتْ {يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ لِمَ تُحَرِّمُ مَا أَحَلَّ اللَّهُ لَكَ}، {إِنْ تَتُوبَا إِلَى اللَّهِ}، لِعَائِشَةَ وَحَفْصَةَ، {وَإِذْ أَسَرَّ النَّبِيُّ إِلَى بَعْضِ أَزْوَاجِهِ حَدِيثًا} لِقَوْلِهِ ” بَلْ شَرِبْتُ عَسَلاً ”. وَقَالَ لِي إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ مُوسَى عَنْ هِشَامٍ، ” وَلَنْ أَعُودَ لَهُ، وَقَدْ حَلَفْتُ، فَلاَ تُخْبِرِي بِذَلِكَ أَحَدًا ”.
Narrated Aisha: The Prophet (ﷺ) used to stay (for a period) in the house of Zainab bint Jahsh (one of the wives of the Prophet ) and he used to drink honey in her house. Hafsa and I decided that when the Prophet (ﷺ) entered upon either of us, she would say, "I smell in you the bad smell of Maghafir (a bad smelling raisin). Have you eaten Maghafir?" When he entered upon one of us, she said that to him. He replied (to her), "No, but I have drunk honey in the house of Zainab bint Jahsh, and I will never drink it again." Then the following verse was revealed: 'O Prophet ! Why do you ban (for you) that which Allah has made lawful for you?…(up to) If you two (wives of the Prophet (ﷺ) turn in repentance to Allah.' (66.1-4) The two were
Aisha and Hafsa And also the Statement of Allah: ‘And (Remember) when the Prophet (ﷺ) disclosed a matter in confidence to one of his wives!’ (66.3) i.e., his saying, “But I have drunk honey.” Hisham said: It also meant his saying, “I will not drink anymore, and I have taken an oath, so do not inform anybody of that.”
Sahih al-Bukhari 6691
Chapter 25: If someone makes some food unlawful for himself, Book 83: Oaths and Vows