• ↑↓ to navigate
  • Enter to open
  • to select
  • Ctrl + Alt + Enter to open in panel
  • Esc to dismiss
⌘ '
keyboard shortcuts

Love

youtube/v=GU4NWj3sDzk

  • Relationships are tricky; as portrayed in media and films…or as Kaguya likes to think: Love is war.
  • We go to lengths in the hope of finding that love, from stalking random people on instagram accounts(I don’t), swiping people left and right on those countless dating apps.
  • Once you’re in a relationship, its a whole different ordeal. Hurt feelings, missed expectations etc etc.
  • Some people just give up when things don’t work out like they expected(like myself) and some do mental gymnastics to find a reason to stay.

Simone De Beauvoir believed love to be an inherent component to the human condition.

  • We wish to be with another, to be heard, to be affirmed in who we’re. Yet time and again we end up in relationships that leave us hurt and even more confused about who we truly are.
  • For Simone De Beauvoir it only justifies the necessity of the ethics of love.
  • For Beauvoir the very ambiguity of love was a gateway to exploitation.
    • Apparent in the gendered differences of what it means to love.
  • “Boys, generally speaking were encouraged to have projects for their lives - to see love as part of life, not all of it and to believe that success was possible in more than one part at once.”
  • “Girls, by contrast, were encouraged to see love as life itself - and to believe that to succeed at other things might make them less loveable.”
  • Men see freedom as their “calling” - whatever that calling might be.
  • Women are taught that love is their key to freedom.

This leads to asymmetry in romantic expectations.

  • Men have been taught to look at their romantic interests are someone who challenges them and brings out their true potential but nonetheless submit to the man’s power.
  • Women in this sense appears to provide almost “mystical” help to this man who has been taught to feel like a protagonist.
  • As pop culture trope the “Manic Pixie Dream Girl”, who acts as a quirky, attractive and spontaneous woman who encourages the protagonist through their resistant and yet yielding validation of man’s true essence.

Beauvoir poignantly defines this issue early on:

  • “The average Western male’s ideal is a woman who freely submits to his domination, who does not accept his ideas without some discussion, but who yields to his reasoning, who intelligently resists but yields in the end.”
  • For both genders Beauvoir discourages us from viewing love as a key to salvation.
  • We should not rely on love to make as feel whole; just like money, goods, social approval (the socially constructed ideas) that promise us freedom and happiness.
  • Treating love as a means to an end will more often than not lead us to unsatisfactory relationships.
  • In “The Denial of Death”, Ernest Becker sees the age of secularism as becoming increasingly reliant on relationships for fulfilling our two ontological motives of “feeling special and unique” and “belonging to something larger”.
  • Previously God used to give us this “validation”, now we seek them in people.
  • People who have their own issues, existential anxieties and quirks that we need to deal with as they deal with ours.
  • Such relationships often end in boredom, resentment and dissatisfaction.
  • Serving only to distract individuals from facing the fears of meaninglessness and death.

Simone De Beauvoir presents two forms of failed love:

The relationship of Narcissism: “Loving oneself and loving in the other, the love they have for you.” Apparent in the Manic Pixie Dream Girl fantasy of the man, who likes the idea of their partner and enjoys the encouragement and validation that comes from being with them. This fulfills the ontological need of feeling “unique” and “special”. However their lover is nothing more than a small character in their story. They neglect the “other:” in the relationship with their own potential waiting to be brought out by encouragement and validation. The narcissistic relationship is self serving and dehumanizing. It often leaves the other individual neglected and unwanted.

The relationship of Devotion: If narcissism in a relationship is making your partner feel like a side character, devotion on the other hand is making them(the partner) write the story for you. Apparent in “Love is everything” fantasy socialized among girls. Where the other is to be treated with utmost devotion and total autonomy. The devoted is there to be served entirely and acts as a “gift” to the other. Thus, fulfilling the ontological need of “belonging to something larger”. “How special is it that this person as chosen me?” You may even believe that tis “meant to be”, slowly forgetting yourself to maintain a relationship that is anything but destined. You make compromises, allowing your “love” to be define who you’re. Making is it even more difficult to leave.

Each side is present in any relationship. To like someone a bit too much and also want some space is natural. But when these turn pathological:

Beauvoir thinks. neither is love but reflections of individuals who do not know themselves quite enough. Neither can be acting maliciously but the damage can be done nonetheless.

Ethical Love is equilibrium; balance between absolute self interest and absolute selflessness.

Beauvoir notes Ethical Love as to “simply walk side by side, mutually helping each other a little.” We give ourselves without losing ourselves. We share each other lives all the while respecting the fact that the good you see in the other cannot be restricted but should be allowed to grow unencumbered by your own idealistic expectations.

You love them for who they're. This can be corrupted if you see the other as either superior or inferior. A healthy relationship is driven by a sense of equality and a shared sense of support.

This kind of relationship is possible anywhere where a human connection is yearning to flourish.

it’s okay to love bad people. - YouTube

Love as appreciation of inherent value

A philosophical perspective that views love as an appreciation of someone’s inherent value as a human being, regardless of their actions or character.

  • Philosophers David Velleman and Kieran Setiya argue that everyone has intrinsic value simply by existing as rational beings or by virtue of their humanity
  • This view holds that it’s rational to love everyone, including “bad” people
  • Distinguishes between the attitude of love and actions taken based on that love

“Both Velleman and Setiya argue that love is an appreciation of someone’s value and for them everyone has value, thus it is rational to love everyone”

“Setiya thinks that people have value simply in Being Human, to love someone is to appreciate someone’s Humanity”

  • How does this perspective challenge our conventional notions of love?
  • Can appreciating someone’s inherent value coexist with holding them accountable for harmful actions?
  • What are the practical implications of viewing love as separate from actions?

Universal Love, Intrinsic human value, Philosophical theories of love

Love as action vs. attitude

Exploring the debate on whether love is primarily defined by our attitudes or by our actions towards others.

  • Some philosophers view love as a mental attitude or appreciation of value
  • Others, like Bell Hooks, argue that “love is as love does” - it must be expressed through actions
  • This distinction has implications for whether it’s possible to love “bad” people

Examples:

  • Parents loving children who have committed terrible acts
  • Loving someone while choosing not to be in a relationship with them

“Bell hooks is known to be a big proponent of this love is as love does view”

“The motto love is as love does is nice to believe in and it definitely holds some truth”

  • How do our actions and attitudes interact in forming loving relationships?
  • Can love exist without corresponding actions?
  • In what situations might it be important to separate loving feelings from loving actions?

Love languages, Behavioral psychology, Relationship dynamics

Impact of trauma on love and behavior

Examining how past trauma can affect a person’s ability to love and act in loving ways.

  • Trauma can impact actions on an unconscious level
  • People may struggle to feel in control of their body or mind due to past experiences
  • This challenges the idea that we have pure rational wills that make choices untethered from influence

Example from “Baby Reindeer”:

  • Character’s traumatic past affects his ability to form healthy relationships and respond appropriately to situations

“Thinking back to psychoanalysis past mistreatment will impact your actions on an unconscious level”

“When we’re faced with a moment of choice most of the choosing is already determined by how our attention has shaped our will”

  • How should we account for trauma when judging someone’s actions in relationships?
  • What role does healing from trauma play in developing healthy loving relationships?
  • How can we balance understanding the impact of trauma with maintaining healthy boundaries?

Trauma-informed care, Attachment Theory, Psychological determinism

Critiquing oversimplified relationship advice

Analyzing the limitations of general relationship maxims and “red flag” lists that don’t account for individual circumstances.

  • Generic relationship advice often fails to consider neurodiversity, mental health issues, or personal histories
  • Overuse of terms like “toxic” and “abusive” can strip them of meaningful content
  • Hyper-individualized mental health discourse can discourage people from supporting loved ones through difficulties

“These General maxims for love like five red flags no matter what relationship you’re in can be inaccurate in non-moral ways as well”

“Mental health has become so hyper individualized that taking on any pain or difficulty to help someone you love has become too much emotional labor”

  • How can we develop more nuanced approaches to evaluating relationships?
  • What are the dangers of applying overly simplistic relationship advice?
  • How can we balance self-care with supporting loved ones through challenges?

Pop psychology critiques, Neurodiversity in relationships, Nuanced relationship advice

Complexity of loving “bad” people

Exploring the ethical and emotional challenges of loving people who have done harmful or immoral things.

  • Discusses examples like parents of murderers who still love their children
  • Examines the tension between loving someone and holding them accountable
  • Considers how structural inequalities and power dynamics affect our ability to love ethically

“Robert E Creo III who is accused of murdering seven people and injuring dozens more in the Highland Park Parade shooting of 2022 rejected a deal to plead guilty in the front row of the trial was Robert’s father”

“To navigate this world as a woman is to encounter not just Predators but Legions of men who insist on being loyal to them”

  • How do we balance love with justice and accountability?
  • Can loving “bad” people be a form of complicity in their harmful actions?
  • How do power dynamics and social structures influence our capacity to love ethically?

Moral philosophy, Criminal justice and families, Ethics of care

Redefining “good” and “bad” in relationships

Challenging simplistic notions of good and bad partners, and advocating for more nuanced understandings of human behavior in relationships.

  • Critiques the overuse of psychiatric terms in everyday conversation
  • Argues for considering individual circumstances and structural factors when judging behavior
  • Suggests that neurodiversity and mental health issues complicate simple categorizations

“We should not Define good and bad in ways that classify people with neurod Divergence or other mental disorders as unlovable”

“Unfortunately the way people overuse psychiatric terms like abusive toxic delusional in everyday conversation has stripped these terms of their real meaning”

  • How can we develop more nuanced ways of evaluating relationship dynamics?
  • What role should context and individual circumstances play in judging behavior?
  • How can we balance understanding for individuals with maintaining healthy relationship standards?

Neurodiversity acceptance, Mental health stigma, Relationship ethics

How to be in a long lasting relationship: simple advice - YouTube

Friendship as the foundation of lasting love

The most important aspect of a long-lasting relationship is friendship. While initial attraction may be based on looks or status, the ability to enjoy each other’s company and become best friends is crucial for a thriving relationship over time. This “quiet love” involves harmonious living side-by-side, becoming guardians of each other’s solitude, and growing together while maintaining deep trust.

Key examples and insights:

  • Friedrich Nietzsche’s view that lack of friendship, not lack of love, causes relationships to fall apart
  • CS Lewis’s concept of “quiet love” as the enduring form of love
  • Bertrand Russell’s analogy of love as a tree with deep roots (trust) and branches reaching skyward (growth)
  • The importance of being able to imagine growing old together and still enjoying each other’s company

“What makes most relationships fall apart is not a lack of love, it is a lack of friendship” - Friedrich Nietzsche

“Love is friendship as a tree that grows very deep roots so that its branches can reach into the sky” - Bertrand Russell

“…become the Guardians of each other’s Solitude” - Rainer Maria Rilke

Reflective questions:

  • How does the quality of friendship in your romantic relationships compare to your platonic friendships?
  • In what ways do you and your partner (or potential partner) nurture each other’s growth?
  • How do you balance maintaining individuality (“solitude”) with togetherness in your relationships?

Quiet love, Friendship in relationships, Long-term compatibility

The interplay between love and friendship

The relationship between love and friendship is complex and multifaceted. While some argue that true love is the highest form of friendship, others suggest that transitioning between friendship and romantic love can be challenging. The ideal scenario involves cultivating both love and friendship simultaneously, creating a strong foundation for a lasting relationship.

Key examples and insights:

  • Samuel Richardson’s view that true love is the highest form of friendship
  • Oscar Wilde’s perspective on the difficulty of transitioning from friends to lovers
  • The challenge of maintaining or returning to friendship after a romantic relationship
  • The importance of mutual respect, intellectual curiosity, and enjoying each other’s company in both friendship and love

“…true love is the highest form of friendship for it lessens your sorrows and it doubles your pleasures” - Samuel Richardson

Reflective questions:

  • How has your experience been with friendships evolving into romantic relationships or vice versa?
  • In what ways do your closest friendships differ from or resemble your romantic relationships?
  • How do you balance the passionate and companionate aspects of love in your relationships?

Love vs friendship, Relationship dynamics, Romantic friendship

Personal qualities that foster lasting relationships

Certain personal qualities and shared experiences contribute to building lasting relationships. These include mutual respect for each other’s ideas, intellectual curiosity, shared interests, and complementary strengths and weaknesses. The ability to bring out the best in each other, even when partners are quite different, is also crucial for a strong, enduring bond.

Key examples and insights:

  • Valuing each other’s opinions and wanting to learn from one another
  • Finding a partner whose intelligence and ideas you admire
  • Shared interests like reading, studying, or competitive spirit in games
  • Complementary personalities that balance each other out

Reflective questions:

  • What qualities do you most admire in your partner or seek in a potential partner?
  • How do your strengths and weaknesses complement those of your partner?
  • In what ways do you and your partner challenge each other to grow and improve?

Compatibility factors, Personal growth in relationships, Mutual respect

The evolution of love over time

Love evolves from initial infatuation to a deeper, more enduring form over time. This transition involves moving from passionate, often idealized love to a quieter, more stable form of affection. The ability to navigate this change and find joy in the day-to-day aspects of a relationship is crucial for long-term happiness.

Key examples and insights:

  • The distinction between initial infatuation and long-term, harmonious living
  • CS Lewis’s concept of “quiet love” as the enduring form of love
  • The importance of being able to imagine enjoying each other’s company in old age
  • Nietzsche’s personal experience with unrequited love and its influence on his philosophy of love and friendship

Reflective questions:

  • How has your understanding and experience of love changed over time?
  • In what ways do you cultivate “quiet love” in your relationships?
  • How do you maintain passion and excitement in a long-term relationship while also developing deeper, more stable forms of affection?

Stages of love, Relationship longevity, Mature love

– #genAI/claude


“The moment we choose to love, we begin to move against domination, against oppression. The moment we choose to love we begin to move towards freedom, to act in ways that liberate ourselves and others. That action is the testimony of love as the practice of freedom.” - Hooks


In Christianity, agape from Ancient Greek ἀγάπη (agápē) is “the highest form of love, charity” and “the love of God for man and of man for God”. This is in contrast to philia, brotherly love, or philautia, self-love, as it embraces a deep and profound sacrificial love that transcends and persists regardless of circumstance. According to 1 Timothy it comes “out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned”. It goes beyond just the emotions to the extent of seeking the best for others. The verb form goes as far back as Homer, translated literally as affection, as in “greet with affection” and “show affection for the dead”. Other ancient authors have used forms of the word to denote love of a spouse or family, or affection for a particular activity, in contrast to eros (an affection of a sexual nature).


Eros from Ancient Greek ἔρως (érōs) ‘love, desire’ is a concept in ancient Greek philosophy referring to sensual or passionate love, from which the term erotic is derived. Eros has also been used in philosophy and psychology in a much wider sense, almost as an equivalent to “life energy”. Protestant author C. S. Lewis posits it as one of the four ancient Greek words for love in Christianity, alongside storage, philia, and agape


To be dead to love, Han argues, is to be dead to thought itself. The Agony of Eros


“This progressive effacement of human relationships is not without certain problems for the novel. How, in point of fact, would one handle the narration of those unbridled passions, stretching over many years, and at times making their effect felt on several generations? We’re a long way from Wuthering Heights, to say the least. The novel form is not conceived for depicting indifference or nothingness; a flatter, more terse, and dreary discourse would need to be invented.” ― Michel Houellebecq, Whatever

“Never Love Unless You Can” ― Thomas Campion, title of 1617 poem

“Love is a decision, not an emotion.” – Lao Tzu, Tao Te Ching


  • Your task is not to seek for love, but merely to seek and find all the barriers within yourself that you have built against it. ― Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad Rūmī
  • “In a soulmate we find not company, but a completed solitude.”— Robert Brault

Still, there is this terrible desire to be loved.
Still, there is this horror at being left behind.
― Michael Cunningham, from The Hours (1998)

Being with you and not being with you is the only way I have to measure time. ― Jorge Luis Borges

  • “Love feels like a great misfortune, a monstrous parasite, a permanent state of emergency that ruins all small pleasures.” ― Slavoj Žižek
  • “If we want the rewards of being loved we have to submit to the mortifying ordeal of being known.” ― Tim Kreider
  • “The first symptom of true love in a man is timidity, in a young woman, boldness. This is surprising, and yet nothing is more simple. It is the two sexes tending to approach each other and assuming each the other’s qualities.” ― Victor Hugo, Les Misérables
  • “Love is like a tree: it grows by itself, roots itself deeply in our being and continues to flourish over a heart in ruin. The inexplicable fact is that the blinder it is, the more tenacious it is. It is never stronger than when it is completely unreasonable.” ― Victor Hugo, The Hunchback of Notre-Dame
  • “The power of a glance has been so much abused in love stories, that it has come to be disbelieved in. Few people dare now to say that two beings have fallen in love because they have looked at each other. Yet it is in this way that love begins, and in this way only.” ― Victor Hugo, Les Misérables
  • “To love or have loved, that is enough. Ask nothing further. There is no other pearl to be found in the dark folds of life.” ― Victor Hugo, Les Misérables
  • “You who suffer because you love, love still more. To die of love, is to live by it.” ― Victor Hugo, Les Misérables
  • “Today I begin to understand what love must be, if it exists. When we are parted, we each feel the lack of the other half of ourselves. We are incomplete like a book in two volumes of which the first has been lost. That is what I imagine love to be: incompleteness in absence.” ― Edmond De Goncourt
  • “It hurts to love. It’s like giving yourself to be flayed and knowing that at any moment the other person may just walk off with your skin.” ― Susan Sontag
  • “In the meantime, I am inventing your presence, just as one day I shall also be unable to let myself die alone, dying is the greatest peril of all, I won’t be able to pass over into death and put my first foot into my first self-absence ― in the last and so first an hour too I shall reinvent your name ― less presence and with you I shall start to die until I am able on my own not to exist, and then I’ll let you go.” ― Clarice Lispector, The Passion According to G.H.
  • To quote Scruton: “Marriage imposes on erotic love the pious arrangement of the home. In entering a marriage, they do not merely exchange promises: they pass together into a condition that is not of their own devising. It contains the deposits of countless previous experiences of intimacy, which has been passed from generation to generation. The marriage ceremony is, therefore, one of the most important of human ceremonies,” a recognition of the sacred, the transcendent.
  • We loved and the closest we’ve come to explaining why … is because it was you and because it was I. ~ Venus Trines at Midnight ― Linda Goodman
  • “My wish is that you may be loved to the point of madness.” ― André Breton
  • If you want to kill somebody, conquer his heart, then leave slowly and leave them between death and madness.” ― Nizar Qabbani
  • “Perhaps one did not want to be loved so much as to be understood.” ― George Orwell
  • “Love is the extremely difficult realization that something other than oneself is real.” ― Iris Murdoch
  • Dependence is scorned even in intimate relationships, as though dependence were incompatible with self-reliance rather than the only thing that makes it possible.” ― Maggie Nelson, The Argonauts

We are one, after all, you and I,
together we suffer,
together exist,
and forever will recreate each other.
― Teilhard de Chardin

  • “I dream of a love that is more than two people craving to possess one another.” ― Irvin D. Yalom

It doesn’t matter if when love calls
I am dead.
I’ll come.
I will always come
if ever
love calls.

― Alejandra Pizarnik

  • To give all for Love is a most sweet bargain. ― Gertrude More
  • Adore each other. Be fiendishly smitten. Be frantically in love. Can there be too many perfumes, too many rosebuds, too many nightingales? Can lovers love each other too much, be too enchanting, too beguiling, too charming? Is it possible to be too much alive, too happy? Adore each other, and never mind the rest. — Victor Hugo, Les Misérables (1862)
  • “What is art but life upon the larger scale, the higher. When, graduating up in a spiral line of still expanding and ascending gyres, it pushes toward the intense significance of all things, hungry for the infinite?” ― Elizabeth Barrett Browning
  • “A soulmate is someone to whom we feel profoundly connected, as though the communication and communing that take place between us were not the product of intentional efforts, but rather a divine grace. This kind of relationship is so important to the soul that many have said there is nothing more precious in life.” ― Thomas Moore
  • “When you realize someone is trying to hurt you, it hurts less. Unless you love them.” ― Shirley Hazzard, The Transit of Venus
  • “Your task is not to seek for love, but merely to seek and find all the barriers within yourself that you have built against it.” ― Rumi
  • “To love or to have loved, that is enough. Ask nothing further. There is no other pearl to be found in the dark folds of life.” ― Victor Hugo
  • “That which we experience when we are in love is perhaps our normal state. Being in love shows a person who they should be.” ― Anton Chekhov
  • Soul is resonance… . We often use the language of soul phenomena without realising we are doing so. We speak of ‘being in tune’ with someone, or ‘being on the same wavelength’. Something about a connection with another person just feels right. It clicks. ― Robert Sardello
  • “While every human being has a capacity for love, its realization is one of the most difficult achievements.” ― Erich Fromm
  • “But there is a charm that is greater still When my love’s eyes are lowered When all is fired by passion’s kiss And through the downcast lashes I see the dull flame of desire.” ― Fyodor Tyutchev
  • “Respect was invented to cover the empty place where love should be.” ― Leo Tolstoy
  • “Love, by its very nature, is unworldly, and it is for that reason, rather than its rarity, that it is not only apolitical but anti-political, perhaps the most powerful of all anti-political human forces.” ― Hannah Arendt
  • Our self – luminous, empty Awareness – knows no resistance and is, therefore, Peace itself; it seeks nothing and is, thus, happiness itself; it is intimately one with all appearances and is, as such, pure love. - Rupert Spira (The Ashes of Love, 2014)
  • “To fall in love is to project the most noble part of one’s being onto another human being (..) the divinity we see in others is truly there, but we don’t have the right to see it until we have taken away our own projections. (..) in-loveness obliterates the humanity of the beloved. One does a curious kind of insult to another by falling in love with him, for we are really looking at our own projection of Concept of God, not at the other person.” ― Robert A. Johnson, Owning Your Own Shadow: Understanding the Dark Side of the Psyche
  • “Romantic love has always been inextricably tied to spiritual aspiration.” ― Robert A. Johnson, We: Understanding the Psychology of Romantic Love
  • “Love is the extremely difficult realisation that something other than oneself is real.” ― Iris Murdoch
  • ‘For many intelligences, the thought of homely intimacies is associated with a spontaneous disgust at too much sweetness–which is why there is neither a philosophy of sweetness nor an elaborated ontology of the intimate.’ ― Sloterdijk
  • “Love is the active concern for the life and the growth of that which we love. Where this active concern is lacking, there is no love.” ― Erich Fromm, The Art of Loving“
  • To love at all is to be vulnerable. Love anything and your heart will be wrung and possibly broken. If you want to make sure of keeping it intact you must give it to no one, not even an animal. Wrap it carefully round with hobbies and little luxuries; avoid all entanglements. Lock it up safe in the casket or coffin of your selfishness. But in that casket, safe, dark, motionless, airless, it will change. It will not be broken; it will become unbreakable, impenetrable, irredeemable. To love is to be vulnerable.” ― C.S. Lewis, The Four Loves
  • “There is no pain in life equal to that which two lovers can inflict on each other.” — Cyril Connolly
  • “There are a hundred thousand species of love, separately invented, each more ingenious than the last, and every one of them keeps making things.” — Richard Powers, The Overstory
  • “To love at all is to be vulnerable.” — C. S. Lewis
  • “The more I think it over, the more I feel that there is nothing more truly artistic than to love people.” — Vincent van Gogh
  • “As the gambler said of his dice, to love and win is the best thing, to love and lose is the next best.” — William Makepeace Thackeray
  • “Doubt as I may, I cannot doubt of my own existence, because my very doubts reveal to me a something which doubts.” - George Henry Lewes
  • “Brichard was quite right when he said to me with his usual malice: ‘When you’re in love with a woman, you must ask yourself: What do I want to do with her?’ - Stendhal, The Life of Henry Brulard

In Islam, Mahabbah refers to love, affection, and devotion, particularly the love of God (Allah) and love for the sake of God. It’s a central concept in Sufism, the mystical branch of Islam, and is considered a crucial element in spiritual development and the formation of an ideal society.

  • Love for God (Mahabbatullah): Mahabbah is often understood as the intense love and devotion a Muslim feels towards Allah, motivating them to obey His commands and strive for His pleasure.
  • Love for the sake of God: This aspect of Mahabbah emphasizes loving others, including fellow Muslims, for God’s sake, fostering unity and compassion within the community.
  • Sufi Perspective: Sufis view Mahabbah as a transformative force that leads to a deeper understanding of God and a closer relationship with Him.
  • Fruits of Mahabbah: The practice of Mahabbah is believed to cultivate virtues like humility, sincerity, and a yearning for God’s proximity.
  • Connection to other Islamic Concepts: Mahabbah is closely related to concepts like khawf (fear of God), shukr (gratitude), and tawakkul (trust in God), forming a holistic framework for spiritual growth.
  • Distinction from other types of love: Islamic scholars differentiate between love for God, love for what God loves, love for God’s sake, and love that is associated with idolatry, as explained by Ibn al-Qayyim.

Love Actually: Effects Of a Post Romantic Worldview on Ourselves and Relationships | Mohammad Isaaq - YouTube

Post-romanticism

The Evolution of Love in a Post-Religious Worldview

The secularization of society led to the separation of deen from state, leaving a void in existential truths. This void gave rise to skepticism, Rationalism, and Reductionism, focusing on aql and dunya over Nafs and ruh (soul).

Key Shifts:

  • Tadhiyya (sacrifice) was replaced with self-gratification.
  • Love became a pursuit of material satisfaction rather than spiritual connection.
  • The heart was de-emphasized, leading to an obsession with Mind and matter.

Reflective Questions:

  • How has skepticism shaped your understanding of tadhiyya in relationships?
  • How do materialistic perspectives challenge the idea of rahma in love?

”Vibes Over Principles” Phenomenon

Modern culture prioritizes vibes (emotions) over usool (principles), undermining responsibility and commitment.

Key Observations:

  • Relationships are often predicated on fleeting feelings rather than enduring huqooq.
  • Emphasis on “feeling good” results in irresponsibility and inability to handle life’s challenges.
  • The Nafs becomes the ultimate authority, leading to emotional fragility.

Reflective Questions:

  • How do you ensure usool guide your relationships rather than transient vibes?
  • In what ways do principles like taqwa strengthen emotional resilience?

The Disney Effect on Love and Relationships

Media perpetuates romanticized notions of love, creating unrealistic expectations and nurturing Narcissism.

Key Impacts:

  • Projection of idealized selves onto partners or strangers, while dismissing familial wisdom.
  • Love viewed as constant emotional highs rather than shared responsibility and rahma.
  • Media narratives glorify individual desires, reinforcing fardiyya (individualism).

Reflective Questions:

  • How do you challenge media-induced perceptions of mahabbah?
  • How can rahma counterbalance unrealistic relationship expectations?

The Crisis of Emotional Validation

A fixation on constant validation has created relationships reliant on emotional satisfaction rather than shared akhlaaq (character) and istiqaama (steadfastness).

Key Observations:

  • Relationships fail when vibes fade, as they are not anchored in usool.
  • Seeking validation online (“I post, therefore I am”) extends into personal connections.

Reflective Questions:

  • How does rahma help ground relationships beyond fluctuating vibes?
  • What role does taqwa play in maintaining stability amid emotional changes?

The Authenticity Trap

The obsession with being one’s “authentic self” discourages accountability and mutual growth in relationships.

Key Issues:

  • Using authenticity to justify harmful behaviors.
  • Viewing criticism as oppression, equating boundaries with zulm (injustice).
  • Preferences elevated to identity markers, rejecting collective frameworks.

Reflective Questions:

  • How do you balance authentic self-expression with Tazkiyah (self-purification)?
  • How can shared huqooq provide a framework for managing individual Nafs?

The Role of Rahma in Relationships

Rahma (mercy) is the cornerstone of enduring love, enabling forgiveness and acceptance when mawaddah (affection) diminishes.

Key Insights:

  • Love must transition from emotional highs (vibes) to sustainable principles (rahma).
  • Accepting human flaws strengthens bonds through taqwa and understanding.
  • Relationships rooted in ibadah to Allah are more resilient to temporal changes.

Reflective Questions:

  • How does rahma shape your perspective on forgiveness and acceptance?
  • In what ways does taqwa guide your actions when vibes fade?

Balancing Love and Responsibility

Traditional relationships emphasized aadaat (practical compatibility) alongside mahabbah (love). Modern dynamics often ignore these aspects, leading to instability.

Key Considerations:

Reflective Questions:

  • How do you balance practical huqooq with emotional needs in relationships?
  • How does focusing on shared responsibilities foster istiqaama in love?

Summary Of Core Themes

  1. Reductionism vs. Holism: The loss of spiritual dimensions (ruh) reduces love to material or chemical phenomena.
  2. Individualism vs. Tadhiyya: Excessive fardiyya leads to neglecting huqooq in relationships.
  3. Romanticism’s Pitfalls: Media promotes self-centered and unrealistic love narratives, undermining rahma.
  4. Emotion vs. Usool: Prioritizing feelings weakens taqwa and adherence to responsibilities.
  5. Authenticity vs. Tazkiyah: Fixation on authenticity obstructs akhlaaq development and mutual growth.
  6. Sacred vs. Secular Love: Removing Allah from love strips it of meaning, reducing it to mere gratification.

References