• ↑↓ to navigate
  • Enter to open
  • to select
  • Ctrl + Alt + Enter to open in panel
  • Esc to dismiss
⌘ '
keyboard shortcuts

up:: Philosophy


Hindu Philosophy

In Hindu philosophy, the concept of enlightenment can be understood through several key terms and concepts:

Moksha

Moksha is the ultimate goal of spiritual liberation in Hinduism. It represents:

  • Release from the cycle of birth, death, and rebirth (samsara)
  • Freedom from ignorance (avidya) and illusion (maya)
  • Realization of the true nature of the self (Atman) and its unity with the ultimate reality (Brahman)

Atman and Brahman

The realization of the relationship between Atman and Brahman is central to enlightenment:

  • Atman: The individual self or soul
  • Brahman: The supreme, universal consciousness or ultimate reality
  • Enlightenment involves recognizing that Atman is identical to Brahman, as expressed in the Upanishadic mahavakya “Tat Tvam Asi” (That Thou Art)

Jnana and Vidya

Enlightenment is often described as a state of supreme knowledge:

  • Jnana: Spiritual knowledge or wisdom
  • Vidya: True knowledge, as opposed to avidya (ignorance)

Samadhi

In yogic traditions, samadhi represents the highest state of meditation and consciousness:

  • Nirvikalpa Samadhi: The highest form of samadhi, where the mind dissolves in Brahman
  • Sahaja Samadhi: A natural state of enlightenment maintained in everyday life

Jivanmukti and Videhamukti

Two stages of liberation are recognized:

  • Jivanmukti: Liberation while still in the physical body
  • Videhamukti: Final liberation after death

Sat-Chit-Ananda


In [classical Tantrik philosophy], Prakasha (प्रकाशा) and Vimarsha (विमर्श) represent the dual aspects of consciousness: Prakasha is the illuminating light or manifestation of consciousness, while Vimarsha is the power of self-awareness or reflection. Prakasha is often associated with Shiva, representing the universal consciousness, while Vimarsha is linked to the Goddess, embodying the power of self-representation. 

Elaboration:

  • Prakasha:

    Prakasha is the universal consciousness, the source of all existence. It’s the light that illuminates everything, the ground of reality. It can also be understood as the manifestation of the divine, the way in which the divine appears in the world.

  • Vimarsha:

    Vimarsha is the power of self-awareness or self-reflection. It’s the ability to recognize ourselves as part of the universal consciousness. It’s also the power by which the divine re-presents itself, creating the individual experiences we have. 

In essence, Prakasha and Vimarsha are two sides of the same coin. Prakasha is the light that illuminates, while Vimarsha is the reflection that allows us to perceive that light. They are interdependent and crucial for understanding the nature of consciousness and the divine.

Tantrism and Shaivism are both important traditions within Hinduism, but they differ in their focus and approach. Shaivism, a major sect of Hinduism, centers on the worship of Shiva as the supreme being, emphasizing his role as the creator, preserver, and destroyer. Tantrism, on the other hand, is a spiritual practice that encompasses various techniques and rituals, aimed at transforming the individual and achieving spiritual enlightenment through the use of energy and consciousness

Here’s a more detailed comparison:

Shaivism: 

  • Focus:

    Worship of Shiva as the supreme being, encompassing his role in the cosmic cycle of creation, preservation, and destruction.

  • Practices:

    Involves various rituals, mantras, and meditations to connect with Shiva and achieve spiritual liberation.

  • Beliefs:

    Shaivas believe that Shiva is the ultimate reality, the source of all creation, and the one who guides individuals towards self-realization. 

Tantrism:

  • Focus:

    Transformation of the individual through the use of various practices, including rituals, meditation, and the cultivation of energy. 

  • Practices:

    Employs a wide range of techniques, including yoga, breathing exercises, mantras, and rituals, to purify the mind and body and tap into spiritual powers. 

  • Beliefs:

    Tantric traditions emphasize the interconnectedness of all things, the power of consciousness, and the potential for transformation through the use of energy and ritual. 

Relationship: 

  • Shared Roots:

    Both Shaivism and Tantrism have deep roots in ancient Hindu traditions, and Tantric practices have been integrated into Shaiva traditions, particularly in Kashmir Shaivism

  • Tantric Practices in Shaivism:

    Shaivism incorporates Tantric practices like yoga, meditation, and rituals to achieve spiritual goals, particularly in the Shaiva Siddhanta and Kashmir Shaivism traditions. 

  • Shiva and Shakti:

    Tantrism often incorporates the concept of Shiva and Shakti (his divine consort), representing the masculine and feminine aspects of the divine, which are also central to Shaivism. 

In essence, Shaivism provides the overarching framework of worshipping Shiva as the supreme being, while Tantrism offers a variety of techniques and practices to facilitate spiritual growth and enlightenment within that framework.

Classical Tantra is a spiritual movement originating on the Indian subcontinent between the 3rd and 12th centuries, encompassing a variety of practices aimed at achieving spiritual liberation through the cultivation of awareness and psychophysical techniques. It’s a system of practices focused on embodied liberation (jīvanmukti) and sees the universe as a microcosm of the individual. Tantra emphasizes the integration of the spiritual and physical, with practices like rituals, meditation, and visualization to achieve enlightenment

Here’s a more detailed look at key aspects of Classical Tantra:

Core Principles:

  • Non-dualism:

    Tantra, particularly in its connection to Advaita Vedanta, emphasizes the non-dual nature of reality, seeing the universe as a manifestation of a single, ultimate reality (Shiva or Brahman). 

  • Interconnectedness:

    Tantra views the individual and the cosmos as interconnected, with the same forces governing both the macrocosmic universe and the microcosmic individual, according to Stanford University

  • Embodiment:

    Tantra emphasizes the importance of the physical body as a vehicle for spiritual realization, encouraging practices that integrate mind, body, and spirit. 

  • Liberation in this lifetime:

    Tantra aims for jīvanmukti, or liberation while still living, rather than waiting for death, according to Tantra Illuminated

Practices:

  • Rituals: Tantric practices involve elaborate rituals, often incorporating elements like incense, flowers, and the worship of deities. 

  • Meditation: Meditation is a crucial component of Tantra, used to deepen awareness and connect with the divine. 

  • Visualization: Visualization techniques, particularly in deity yoga, are used to realize oneself as a manifestation of a Tantric deity, according to Yogapedia

  • **Mandalas: Mandalas, intricate geometric patterns, are used as a focal point for meditation and visualization, aiding in the development of spiritual insight. 

  • **Yoga: Yoga, in its various forms, is also a significant aspect of Tantric practice, focusing on the physical and mental aspects of spiritual cultivation. 

Types of Tantra:

  • **Kriya Tantra: Focuses on external activities and rituals, often involving purification practices, according to SamyeLing.org

  • Carya Tantra: Balances external activities with inner meditative stability, striking a balance between the physical and spiritual. 

  • Yoga Tantra: Emphasizes yogic practices and techniques to cultivate inner awareness and achieve enlightenment, according to Yogapedia

  • Anuttarayoga Tantra: The highest form of Tantra, involving advanced practices and teachings, according to SamyeLing.org

Tantra and the “Left-Hand Path”:

  • Some Tantric traditions, particularly those associated with the “Left-Hand Path” (vāmācārin), incorporate elements that may seem counterintuitive or even controversial, such as the use of forbidden substances or practices, wikipedia/en/PanchamakaraWikipedia.
  • These practices are often seen as a way to break through limiting beliefs and transcend conventional boundaries, wikipedia/en/PanchamakaraWikipedia.

1. Empirical Refutation of “Opposing Forces” (Shiva and Shakti)

The argument of “Shiva” (desireless force/zero) and “Shakti” (desire force/one) posits that creation is made up of two eternal, complementary forces. From an empirical and logical standpoint, this claim has flaws:

Empirical Basis (Law of Causality):

  1. Creation Requires a Cause:

    • The universe cannot sustain itself through opposing or self-existing forces because everything created requires an external cause.
    • Opposing forces such as “zero” (desireless) and “one” (desire) are part of creation and cannot be causes of existence because they themselves would require a cause.
  2. Unified Creator Over Opposing Forces:

    • Empirically, systems in nature show harmony and unity rather than duality at their root. For example:
      • Gravity, electromagnetism, and forces in physics work in harmony under a unified set of natural laws.
      • The fine-tuning of the universe points to an Intelligent Designer who unifies and governs everything.
  3. Analogy – The Watchmaker:
    If you see a watch with interlocking gears, you don’t conclude that the gears created themselves. Instead, the watch points to an external designer. Similarly:

    • Opposing forces like “desire” and “desireless” are like the gears in the watch—they operate under a system created and controlled by an external Cause (Allah).
    • Allah is not part of the system (unlike the Shiva/Shakti claim), but He created and sustains it.

Qur’anic Principle:

Allah challenges the idea of independent or opposing forces creating the universe:

“Were there gods besides Allah in the heavens and the earth, they both would have been ruined. So exalted is Allah, Lord of the Throne, above what they describe.”
(Surah Al-Anbiya, 21:22)

This verse rejects the idea of multiple or opposing forces governing creation by pointing out that the result would be chaos, not harmony.


2. Human Nature: Desires and Balance

The argument claims that identifying with “Shakti” (desires) creates chaos (a sinusoidal wave of life) and that peace lies in identifying with “zero” or pure stillness. Islam refutes this dualistic outlook empirically and practically:

Empirical Refutation:

  1. Desire Is a Natural Part of Human Life:

    • Desires are not “forces to crush” but part of our human nature, given to us for survival (e.g., desire for food, companionship, and growth).
    • What creates chaos is not the existence of desires but the mismanagement of desires.
  2. Analogy – Fire as a Tool:

    • Desires are like fire:
      • Controlled fire cooks food, provides warmth, and benefits humanity.
      • Uncontrolled fire burns houses and causes destruction.
    • Similarly, desires managed according to divine guidance bring growth and fulfillment, while unchecked desires cause spiritual and emotional chaos.
  3. Balance, Not Elimination:

    • Islam doesn’t demand eliminating desires (like identifying with “zero”), but balancing them.
    • Analogy – A Car Engine:
      • A car needs fuel (desires) to move, but it also needs brakes (self-restraint) and a steering wheel (divine guidance) to travel safely.
      • Eliminating the fuel (desires) means the car doesn’t move, and chaos ensues.
      • Islam provides the steering wheel through Allah’s commands to guide desires in the right direction.
  4. Empirical Benefits of Balance:

    • Scientific studies show that suppressing desires entirely leads to mental and emotional distress.
    • Balance (e.g., moderation in food, sleep, relationships) leads to optimal health and psychological well-being.

Qur’anic Principle:

Allah created desires for a purpose, and He guides us to manage them:

“And [by] the soul and He who proportioned it, and inspired it [with discernment of] its wickedness and its righteousness. He has succeeded who purifies it, and he has failed who instills it [with corruption].”
(Surah Ash-Shams, 91:7-10)


3. Refutation of “Pure Zero” as Consciousness

The idea of identifying with “pure zero” (Shiva) and achieving a silent consciousness is similar to pantheism or monism, which suggests the self merges into a universal void. Islam counters this with clear reasoning:

Empirical Refutation:

  1. Consciousness Requires an Independent Cause:

    • Consciousness, whether silent or active, cannot arise from a void.
    • Modern science confirms that consciousness is a unique feature of living, created beings, not abstract nothingness.
  2. Analogy – A Book and Its Author:

    • A book cannot write itself or derive meaning from “zero.” An author is needed.
    • Similarly, our consciousness is not self-existing or self-defining. It is created by Allah with a purpose: to know Him and worship Him.
    • Becoming “silent” or “nothing” (zero) is not progress; it is a rejection of purpose and reality.
  3. The Misconception of Peace in “Nothingness”:

    • Seeking peace through “nothingness” is escapism. True peace comes from aligning one’s life with a greater purpose.
    • Analogy – A River:
      • A river flows toward a destination (the ocean). If it stops flowing (zero), it stagnates and becomes lifeless.
      • Similarly, humans need purpose and movement—toward Allah, the Ultimate Source of peace and fulfillment.

Qur’anic Principle:

True peace comes through the remembrance and submission to Allah:

“Unquestionably, by the remembrance of Allah hearts find rest.”
(Surah Ar-Ra’d, 13:28)


4. Sinusoidal Life and Troubles

The argument that identifying with desires (Shakti) creates “sinusoidal waves” of troubles fails to recognize that struggle and hardship are natural parts of life:

Empirical Refutation:

  1. Life Is Designed With Ups and Downs:

    • Struggle, growth, and hardship are natural aspects of life that build character, resilience, and meaning.
    • Scientific studies show that overcoming challenges leads to stronger emotional and mental well-being.
  2. Analogy – Strength Training:

    • Just as muscles grow stronger by resisting weights, human souls grow through challenges.
    • The “sinusoidal wave” of life (ups and downs) is an opportunity to turn to Allah for help, grow spiritually, and achieve greater peace.
  3. Islam Teaches Gratitude and Patience:

    • Hardships are not chaotic waves to escape but trials to grow from.
    • Qur’an: “And We will surely test you with something of fear and hunger and a loss of wealth and lives and fruits, but give good tidings to the patient.”
      (Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:155)

Conclusion Through Analogy

  1. The Watchmaker:
    Opposing forces like “Shiva and Shakti” are gears in a watch—part of creation, not the Creator. Allah is the Designer and Sustainer.

  2. The Fire:
    Desires (Shakti) are like fire—beneficial when controlled, destructive when unchecked. Balance, not elimination, is key.

  3. The River:
    Life must flow toward purpose (Allah). Seeking “nothingness” stagnates the soul and denies its reason for existence.

  4. The Car:
    Desires are the fuel, and divine guidance is the steering wheel. Both are necessary for safe and meaningful progress.

In Islam, peace and purpose do not lie in crushing desires or escaping into “nothingness.” Instead, they are found in submission to Allah, who created us for a greater purpose and has given us the tools (guidance) to balance life’s challenges.

“So remember Me; I will remember you. And be grateful to Me and do not deny Me.”
(Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:152)

Resources

This statement is a key concept from Vedanta philosophy, particularly from the teachings of Patanjali’s Yoga Sutras, highlighting the nature of the “Purusha” (pure consciousness) as the very essence of love, existence, and knowledge, not merely experiencing these states but being them completely

Breakdown:

  • “The Purusha does not love, it is love itself”:

    This means that the true self, the Purusha, is not someone who experiences love, but rather love is its very nature.

  • “It does not exist, it is existence itself”:

    Similarly, the Purusha isn’t something that simply exists, but is the very essence of existence itself.

  • “The Soul does not know, It is knowledge itself”:

    This emphasizes that the soul, which is considered synonymous with the Purusha in this context, is not a separate entity that acquires knowledge, but is knowledge itself. 

Key points to remember:

  • Transcendent nature:

    This statement describes the Purusha as a completely transcendent reality, beyond the limitations of the physical world and individual consciousness.

  • Non-duality:

    The idea that the Purusha is not separate from love, existence, or knowledge points to a non-dualistic philosophy, where the subject and object are ultimately unified.