• ↑↓ to navigate
  • Enter to open
  • to select
  • Ctrl + Alt + Enter to open in panel
  • Esc to dismiss
⌘ '
keyboard shortcuts

Hinduism

AKA Non-duality

The seeker is he who is in search of himself.

Give up all questions except one: ‘Who am I?’ After all, the only fact you are sure of is that you are. The ‘I am’ is certain. The ‘I am this’ is not.

Struggle to find out what you are in reality.

To know what you are, you must first investigate and know what you are not.

Discover all that you are not — body, feelings thoughts, time, space, this or
that — nothing, concrete or abstract, which you perceive can be you. The very act of perceiving shows that you are not what you perceive.

The clearer you understand on the level of mind you can be described in negative terms only, the quicker will you come to the end of your search and realise that you are the limitless being. — Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj


The word ‘Hinduism ‘ does not appear anywhere in Hindu scriptures, The proper name for Hinduism is ‘Sanatan Dharma’ Sanatan = eternal Dharma = religion.
Hinduism cannot be described as an organized religion. It is not founded by any individual. Hinduism is God centred and therefore one can call Hinduism as founded by God, because the answer to the question ‘Who is behind the eternal principles and who makes them work?’ will have to be ‘Cosmic power, Divine power, God’
Hinduism is God centred whereas other religions are prophet centred. For this reason the whole of mankind has to abide by (or is affected by) the eternal principles. The question of acceptance or rejection of Hinduism by any individual simply does not arise, or is irrelevant. It is illogical to talk of conversion to Hinduism. It is like saying that the laws of physics (e.g.gravity) will apply to you only if you belong to an organization or organized religion.
[The ceremonies and rituals connected with Hinduism (and other religions) are designed to cultivate increased spirituality. At advanced level of spirituality, rituals and ceremonies are dispensed with]
Swami Vivekananda wrote:If you want to be religious, enter not the gate of any organised religion. They do a hundred times more evil than good, because they stop the growth of each one’s individual development…. Religion is only between you and your God, and no third person must come between you. Think what these organised religions have done! What Nepoleon was more terrible than those religious persecutions? If you and I organise, we begin to hate every person . It is better not to love, if loving only means hating others. That is no love. That is hell! If loving your own people means hating everybody else, it is the quintessence of selfishness and brutality, and the effect is that it will make you brutes


Advaita Vedanta is a school of Hindu philosophy that emphasizes the idea of non-duality, or the unity of the individual self (atman) with the ultimate reality (Brahman). It is considered one of the classical philosophical systems of India, and its ideas have had a profound influence on Hindu thought. The term “Advaita” comes from the Sanskrit words “a” (not) and “dvaita” (dual), and its central tenet is the idea that there is only one ultimate reality, Brahman, and that the individual self, or atman, is ultimately the same as Brahman.

Advaita Vedanta is a monistic philosophy, meaning it posits that there is only one ultimate reality, Brahman, and that all other things are essentially illusory and temporary. The individual self, or atman, is seen as a temporary manifestation of Brahman, and the goal of the individual is to realize this ultimate unity and become one with Brahman. This realization is known as moksha, or liberation, and is achieved through a combination of self-inquiry, meditation, and the study of scriptures.

One of the key ideas of Advaita Vedanta is the concept of maya, or illusion. According to this philosophy, the world we experience through our senses is not real in the ultimate sense, but is rather an illusion created by the mind. This illusion is caused by our ignorance of the true nature of reality, and it prevents us from realizing our essential unity with Brahman. In order to break free from this illusion, we must develop self-awareness and cultivate a deep understanding of the true nature of reality.

Another important concept in Advaita Vedanta is the idea of karma, or the law of cause and effect. According to this philosophy, our actions have consequences, both in this life and in future lives. Good actions lead to good consequences, while bad actions lead to bad consequences. The ultimate goal of Advaita Vedanta is to break free from the cycle of karma and achieve moksha, or liberation, which is seen as the end of suffering and the attainment of ultimate freedom and bliss.

The founder of Advaita Vedanta is believed to be the ancient Indian sage named Adi Shankara, who lived in the 8th century CE. He wrote extensively on the philosophy, and his works continue to be studied and revered by followers of Advaita Vedanta. Shankara’s philosophy was based on the teachings of the Upanishads, a collection of ancient Hindu texts, and he sought to reconcile the ideas of non-duality with the dualistic worldview of the Vedas, the oldest Hindu scriptures.

The Upanishads are a collection of ancient Hindu texts that contain philosophical teachings and ideas about the nature of reality. They are considered to be part of the Vedas, the oldest Hindu scriptures, but are distinct from the rest of the Vedas in their focus on philosophical speculation and contemplation. The Upanishads are known for their emphasis on the idea of non-duality, or the unity of the individual self (atman) with the ultimate reality (Brahman).

Gaudapada was an Indian philosopher who lived in the 6th century CE. He is best known for his commentary on the Mandukya Upanishad, in which he introduced the concept of the substratum (adhisthana) as the ultimate reality. According to Gaudapada, the substratum is the unchanging and eternal ground of being, which underlies and supports the manifest world of change and diversity. It is the ultimate source and support of all things, and the true nature of the self. Gaudapada’s concept of the substratum has influenced many later philosophers in India, including Shankara, who developed it further in his Advaita (non-dual) philosophy.

See also:: __temp__Quantum

From an Advaita Vedanta perspective, this analogy aligns closely with the concept of samskaras (संस्कार) and vasanas (वासनाएँ).

  1. Samskaras: These are subtle mental impressions or imprints left on the mind (chitta) by repeated actions, thoughts, or experiences. Just as the hot water creates and deepens channels in the jelly, every repeated action or thought leaves behind a mental groove or samskara, making it more likely for similar actions or thoughts to occur again.
  2. Vasanas: Over time, deeply ingrained samskaras give rise to vasanas, which are tendencies, latent desires, or habitual inclinations that influence behavior. Vasanas represent the “line of least resistance” for the mind, causing it to act in accordance with these entrenched patterns, much like water flowing into deepened channels.
  3. Karma and Conditioning: The repeated pouring of hot water mirrors the way karma (actions) shapes our conditioning. Actions, when performed repeatedly, solidify into habits (vasanas) that become difficult to break, binding the individual to a cycle of behavior.
  4. Chitta-Vritti: In Yogic terminology, the “channels” formed can be seen as disturbances or modifications of the mind, known as chitta-vrittis. These mental fluctuations reinforce patterns and perpetuate attachment to certain ways of thinking or behaving.

Summary:

The jelly analogy metaphorically represents how repeated actions (karma) form samskaras (mental grooves) in the mind. Over time, these grooves deepen into vasanas (habitual tendencies), making it challenging to deviate from established patterns. Breaking free from these entrenched habits requires self-discipline (tapas), awareness, and practices like meditation and self-inquiry (atma-vichara) to dissolve these impressions and attain liberation (moksha).


This claim—that the “observer” (subject) is distinct from “objective reality,” aligning with Vedanta’s concepts of Apara (lower knowledge) and Para (higher knowledge)—can be understood and addressed empirically, philosophically, and through the Islamic worldview.

1. Understanding the Claim

In Vedanta:

  • Apara Knowledge: Refers to lower, worldly, and empirical knowledge—gained through the senses and mind, dealing with associations and appearances.
  • Para Knowledge: Represents higher, spiritual, and subjective knowledge—focused on realizing the “ultimate reality” (Brahman) or pure consciousness, which transcends sensory perception.

The claim argues that subjective reality (the observer) is different from objective reality (what is observed), suggesting a dualistic or hierarchical understanding of knowledge. While this notion attempts to make sense of reality, it has philosophical and logical flaws when analyzed critically and through the lens of Islam.

2. Refuting the Dualistic Knowledge Claim Empirically

Subject And Object Are Interconnected

  1. Empirical Evidence from Modern Science:

    • Modern physics, particularly in quantum mechanics, highlights the relationship between the observer and the observed. For example:
      • The Observer Effect: In experiments, the act of observation affects the outcome (e.g., measuring an electron’s position changes its behavior).
    • This relationship demonstrates that the observer (subject) and the observed (object) are not entirely separate. Knowledge depends on interaction between the two.

    Analogy:

    • Imagine light shining on an object. Without the light (interaction), the object cannot be seen. Similarly, subjective knowledge requires interaction with objective reality.
    • Claiming that deeper “subjective” knowledge exists in isolation is flawed because it requires engagement with the external world to have meaning.
  2. The Limitation of Pure Subjectivity:

    • Relying on subjective reality alone (Para knowledge) for understanding the ultimate truth is unreliable. Human perception and consciousness are limited and often subjective to bias, emotions, and mental states.

    Analogy:

    • If a person claims to know the truth purely through introspection (without engaging the external world), it is like a person closing their eyes and guessing what the weather is like outside. Their conclusion is based on assumption rather than evidence.

Islamic Perspective: Knowledge Is Unified

In Islam, the observer (subject) and creation (objective reality) are interconnected as signs (ayah) of Allah. Knowledge in Islam integrates both empirical reality and spiritual understanding, but it does not separate them into dualistic hierarchies:

  1. Objective Reality Points to Allah:

    • The external world (objective reality) is not an illusion. It is a creation of Allah and a means to recognize Him.

    • Qur’an: “We will show them Our signs in the horizons and within themselves until it becomes clear to them that it is the truth. But is it not sufficient concerning your Lord that He is, over all things, a Witness?”
      (Surah Fussilat, 41:53)

    • The verse affirms that knowledge of Allah comes from observing both external reality (horizons) and introspection (within themselves). The two are complementary, not separate.

  2. Subjective Experience Needs Guidance:

    • Relying solely on subjective experience (Para knowledge) to reach ultimate truth leads to error, as human perception is limited.

    • Islam teaches that ultimate truth is revealed by Allah through divine guidance (Qur’an and Sunnah).

    • Qur’an: “And Allah brought you out of the wombs of your mothers not knowing a thing, and He made for you hearing and vision and intellect that perhaps you would be grateful.”
      (Surah An-Nahl, 16:78)

    • Human faculties (senses, intellect) are gifts from Allah to gain knowledge. Combining subjective reflection with objective observation leads to gratitude and awareness of Allah.

3. Reconciling Dual Knowledge With Islam: Analogy of the Map

The distinction between Apara (lower knowledge) and Para (higher knowledge) can be addressed through a unified perspective in Islam:

Analogy: The Map and the Traveler

  • Imagine a traveler using a map to navigate a journey. The map represents objective reality (empirical knowledge, Apara), while the traveler’s ability to interpret and use the map reflects subjective understanding (inner reflection, Para).
  1. Objective Knowledge Is Essential:
    • Without the map (external knowledge of reality), the traveler cannot know where to go.
  2. Subjective Reflection Gives Purpose:
    • Without the traveler’s intent (inner awareness), the map has no meaning or direction.

In Islam:

  • True knowledge integrates external signs (objective reality) with inner understanding (subjective reflection) to recognize the Creator, Allah.
  • The Qur’an serves as the “map” that guides human intellect and perception toward the ultimate truth.

4. Islamic Integration of Knowledge: Objective and Subjective

Islam rejects the idea of purely “subjective” truth as sufficient for understanding reality. Instead, it teaches a holistic approach where both objective and subjective knowledge serve to fulfill the ultimate purpose: recognizing and worshiping Allah.

  1. Objective Reality (Signs in Creation):

    • Observing the world, nature, and the universe leads to recognition of the Creator.
    • Qur’an: “Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth and the alternation of the night and the day are signs for those of understanding.”
      (Surah Aal Imran, 3:190)
  2. Subjective Reality (Introspection and Reflection):

    • Reflecting on one’s self and experiences deepens understanding of Allah’s mercy, wisdom, and power.
    • Qur’an: “And in yourselves. Then will you not see?”
      (Surah Adh-Dhariyat, 51:21)
  3. Ultimate Reality:

    • The culmination of both knowledge types is to affirm Tawheed (Oneness of Allah), the ultimate reality.
    • Qur’an: “That is Allah, your Lord, the Truth. And what can be beyond truth except error? So how are you averted?”
      (Surah Yunus, 10:32)

5. Final Analogy: The Mirror and the Light

The human observer (subject) and the universe (objective reality) can be compared to a mirror and light:

  • The universe is the light, reflecting Allah’s signs and attributes.
  • The human heart is the mirror that reflects this light.
  • If the mirror (heart) is clean and guided, it reflects the truth clearly. If it is clouded by ignorance or error, the truth becomes distorted.

This analogy emphasizes that knowledge is not about negating objective reality (as Vedanta suggests) but aligning the heart (subjective self) to perceive reality as it truly is—a creation of Allah.

Conclusion

The distinction between “Apara” and “Para” knowledge in Vedanta is incomplete because:

  1. Negating reality (neti-neti) without affirming truth leads to confusion.
  2. Subjective knowledge alone is unreliable due to human limitations.

Islam provides a unified view where:

  • Objective knowledge (the external world) and subjective reflection (introspection) are both signs of Allah.
  • True knowledge is guided by divine revelation (the Qur’an) to affirm the ultimate truth: the Oneness of Allah.

Instead of “not this, not that” (neti-neti), Islam teaches “This is Allah”:

“That is Allah, your Lord. There is no deity except Him, the Creator of all things. So worship Him. And He is Disposer of all things.”
(Surah Al-An’am, 6:102)


Analyzing The Shortcomings of Hindu Philosophy

  1. Polytheism and the Problem of Divided Authority:

    • Hinduism is characterized by polytheism or henotheism (belief in one god while acknowledging others), which results in conflicting and incoherent views of the divine.
    • The Islamic concept of Tawheed (monotheism) is clear and logical: one supreme Creator governs all existence, eliminating contradictions in divine will.
  2. The Doctrine of Karma and Reincarnation:

    • Karma and reincarnation assume endless cycles of birth and rebirth to attain moksha (liberation). This philosophy lacks a clear path for ultimate justice and accountability, as it is impersonal and deterministic.
    • In Islam, ultimate justice is in the hands of Allah, who judges every individual fairly based on their intentions and actions, with the possibility of repentance and divine mercy.
  3. Caste System and Social Injustice:

    • Rooted in Hindu philosophy, the caste system perpetuates systemic inequality, discrimination, and oppression.
    • Islam categorically rejects such hierarchies, emphasizing human equality before Allah. “The most honored by Allah is the one with the most taqwa (piety)” Quran 49:13.
  4. Epistemological Confusion:

    • Hinduism often relies on subjective mystical experiences and a wide variety of contradictory scriptures, leading to confusion and inconsistency in beliefs.
    • Islamic theology provides a unified and consistent framework grounded in the Quran and authentic Hadith, with clear epistemological principles.
  5. Detachment from Reality:

    • Hindu and Buddhist philosophies often promote detachment from the material world to escape suffering, which can lead to passivity and neglect of societal responsibilities.
    • Islam encourages active engagement in the world while maintaining spiritual focus, balancing material and spiritual needs.
  6. Pantheism and Non-Dualism:

    • Hindu Advaita Vedanta (non-dualism) dissolves the distinction between Creator and creation, making the worship of anything possible.
    • Islam’s strict monotheism affirms the transcendence of Allah, who is distinct from His creation, preserving the sanctity of worship.

Why Such Philosophies Are Detrimental

  1. Lack of Accountability:

    • A belief in reincarnation undermines the urgency of moral accountability in this life, potentially leading to moral apathy.
    • Islamic teachings emphasize the Day of Judgment and the finality of this life as the only chance to earn eternal rewards or avoid punishment.
  2. Spiritual Nihilism:

    • The focus on dissolving the self (atman) into a universal reality (Brahman) can lead to existential despair and a lack of purpose.
    • Islam provides a clear purpose: to worship Allah and strive for His pleasure, giving life ultimate meaning.
  3. Practical Failures:

    • The caste system rooted in Hindu philosophy has caused widespread social division and suffering.
    • Islamic practices like zakat (charity) and sadaqah (voluntary charity) promote social welfare and equality.
  4. Alienation from the Creator:

    • By equating God with creation or reducing Him to anthropomorphic deities, Hinduism diminishes the majesty of the Creator.
    • Islam emphasizes the grandeur of Allah, who is beyond comprehension yet closer to us than our jugular vein (Quran 50:16).

Are Hindus “Doomed”?

  1. Guidance Is Always Possible:

    • No group of people is inherently doomed. Islam teaches that guidance is available to all who seek it sincerely. The Quran states, “Indeed, Allah does not wrong the people at all, but it is the people who are wronging themselves” Quran 10:44.
  2. Engaging in Dawah:

    • Instead of dismissing Hindus, Muslims are encouraged to engage in thoughtful dawah (invitation to Islam) by presenting the truth of Islam in a respectful and compassionate manner.
  3. Shared Values:

    • Some values in Hinduism, like emphasis on charity, respect for elders, and the pursuit of knowledge, can serve as starting points for meaningful dialogue.

Conclusion

Hindu philosophy has significant limitations when analyzed through the lens of logic, metaphysics, and theology, particularly when compared to the holistic worldview of Islam. However, it is essential to approach such discussions with the aim of guidance, not condemnation. Islam’s mission is to call people towards the truth with wisdom and beautiful preaching, as emphasized in Surah An-Nahl:

“Invite to the way of your Lord with wisdom and good instruction, and argue with them in a way that is best.” Quran 16:125.


“Satyameva jayate nānṛtaṃ satyena panthā vitato devayānaḥ yenākramantyṛṣayo hyāptakāmā yatra tat satyasya paramaṃ nidhānam” translates to ”Truth alone triumphs, not falsehood; by truth, the path of the divine (Devayana) is spread out, on which the sages, with desires fulfilled, travel, where is the supreme treasure of Truth.”. 

Key points about this phrase:

  • Source: This line is from the Mundaka Upanishad, a Hindu scripture. 
  • Meaning: It emphasizes the power of truth, stating that those who follow truth will ultimately prevail over falsehood. 
  • National Motto of India: “Satyameva Jayate” is the national motto of India, meaning “Truth alone triumphs”. 

Breakdown of the phrase:

  • Satyameva Jayate: Truth alone triumphs
  • Nānṛtaṃ: Not falsehood
  • Satyena panthā vitato devayānaḥ: By truth, the path of the divine is spread out
  • Yenākramantyṛṣayo hyāptakāmā: On which sages, with desires fulfilled, travel
  • Yatra tat satyasya paramaṃ nidhānam: Where is the supreme treasure of Truth

Vasanas are behavioral tendencies or mental impressions that influence a person's thoughts, emotions, and actions. They are a technical term in Indian philosophy, especially in Yoga, Buddhism, and Advaita Vedanta. 

Here are some characteristics of vasanas:

  • Subconscious

    Vasanas are subtle impressions left in the subconscious mind by past actions and experiences. They are often below the level of conscious awareness. 

  • Powerful

    Vasanas are powerful enough to direct the flow of thoughts and actions, even though they are often unnoticed. 

  • Derived from Sanskrit

    The word “vasana” comes from the Sanskrit root “vas,” which means “to dwell” or “to reside”. 

  • Related to samskaras

    Vasanas are often described as a chain of samskaras, which are similar impressions that can become so ingrained in the psyche that they are an innate part of a person’s personality. 

  • Can be overcome

    Vasanas can be overcome through tapas and nirodha parinama. 

Understanding vasanas is important for spiritual progress and overcoming habitual patterns. Yoga can help bring latent tendencies to the surface, which can then be witnessed and released.


According to the Yajurveda, Chapter 40, Verse 8-9, the statement “He is imageless and Pure” signifies that the divine being is beyond form and completely pure, essentially advocating against idol worship and emphasizing the concept of a formless, absolute God. 

Key points about this verse:

  • Interpretation:

    This verse is often interpreted as a rejection of worshipping physical idols or natural elements, suggesting that the true divine essence cannot be confined to any image or material form.

  • Philosophical implication:

    It highlights the concept of “Brahman” in Hinduism, which refers to the ultimate reality that is all-pervading, formless, and pure consciousness.

From the Rig Veda, Book One

“Truth is one, God is One, sages call Him by many names; there are many attributes given but no definitions or images for God.”

This statement, often paraphrased as “Truth is one, sages call it by many names,” is found in the Rig Veda, specifically Book 1, Hymn 164, Verse 46, and expresses the core Hindu concept that while there is only one ultimate reality (God, Truth), different people and traditions may refer to it using various names and attributes, without any definitive image or form associated with it. 

Key points about this verse:

  • Monotheistic essence: Despite the appearance of multiple deities in Hindu mythology, this verse emphasizes the singular nature of the divine. 
  • Symbolic interpretations: The “many names” are seen as different ways to describe the same ultimate reality, depending on the perspective and context. 
  • Beyond definition: The verse explicitly states that God cannot be fully defined or captured by human imagery.

From the Rig Veda, Brahma Sutra

The phrase “ekam Brahma” from the Brahma Sutras, not directly from the Rig Veda, translates to "One Brahman" and signifies the core concept of Vedanta philosophy, stating that the ultimate reality is singular and unified, referred to as Brahman; essentially meaning there is only one divine essence underlying everything. 

Key points about “ekam Brahma”:

  • Source:

    While the idea is deeply rooted in Vedic teachings, the exact phrase “ekam Brahma” appears in the Brahma Sutras, a text considered to be a summary of the Upanishads, which are philosophical portions of the Vedas.

  • Interpretation:

    This phrase is considered the foundational principle of Advaita Vedanta, a school of Hindu philosophy that emphasizes the non-dual nature of reality, where the individual soul (Atman) is ultimately identical to Brahman.

  • Significance:

    “Ekam Brahma” is often used as a starting point for discussing the nature of Brahman and the path to realizing this ultimate unity.

This concept of monotheism and formlessness in Hinduism is supported by additional scriptural references:

  • The Svetasvatara Upanishad states “There is no likeness of Him” and “His form is not to be seen; no one sees Him with the eye.”[2]
  • The Yajurveda declares “There is no image of Him” and “He is bodiless and pure.”[3]
  • The Brahma Sutra explicitly states “There is only one God, not the second; not at all, not at all, not in the least bit.”[3]

This understanding of a singular, formless divine reality is fundamental to Hindu theology, even though later traditions developed various representations and manifestations of the divine[2]. The scriptures consistently emphasize that while God may be called by many names and described through various attributes, the ultimate reality is One without a second[2][3].

Citations:

[1] https://pplx-res.cloudinary.com/image/upload/v1735529497/user_uploads/vUnsjAEYHrBCZNa/image.jpg

[2] https://www.swami-krishnananda.org/disc/disc_14.html

[3] https://alhidaayah.com/lessons/lesson-2-concept-of-god-in-hinduism/

[4] https://www.islam101.com/religions/hinduism/conceptOfGod.htm

[5] http://hindudharmaforums.com/showthread.php

[6] http://a5221985.github.io/seeking_the_truth_site/site/concept_of_god_in_hinduism/


Dhammapada:
Who is capable of praising one like a coin of finest gold, one whom the knowing praise after finding him impeccable, controlled, intelligent, insightful, ethical, and composed day in and day out? Even the gods praise such a one, even the Creator.

Translator comments:
The name of the last prophet of the Abrahamic tradition, who embodied these qualities, literally means Praised One. A similar description is given in a hymn of the Torah.

Chapter XVII of Dhammapada: The Sayings of Buddha, translated by Thomas Cleary

Quotes

  • “The ultimate goal of human life is to realize the identity of the individual self and the ultimate reality.” - Adi Shankara
  • “The world is not separate from the Self. The Self is the world.” - Ramana Maharshi
  • “The individual self is nothing but the supreme Self, covered by the veil of ignorance.” - Sankara
  • “The Self is not something to be attained. It is already present. It is the essential nature of the individual.” - Swami Satchidananda
  • “The Self is the only reality. The ego, the individual self, is an illusion.” - Swami Sivananda
  • “The Self is not an object to be known, but the very source of knowledge itself.” - Swami Vivekananda
  • “The Self is not separate from the universe, nor is the universe separate from the Self. The Self is the universe and the universe is the Self.” - Shankara
  • “The world is a construct of our sensations, perceptions, memories. It is convenient to regard it as existing objectively on its own. But it certainly does not become manifest by its mere existence.” - Erwin Schrödinger
  • What we observe as material bodies and forces are nothing but shapes and variations in the structure of space. Particles are just schaumkommen (appearances).” - Erwin Schrödinger
  • “The total number of minds in the world is one.” - Erwin Schrödinger
  • “The unity and continuity of mind is not impaired by the separation of bodies.” - Erwin Schrödinger
  • “I am not a unit. I am a unity.” - Erwin Schrödinger
  • That in whom reside all beings and who resides in all beings, who is the giver of grace to all, the Supreme Soul of the universe, the limitless being ~ I am that. —Amritbindu Upanishad
  • That which permeates all, which nothing transcends and which, like the universal space around us, fills everything completely from within and without, that Supreme non-dual Brahman ~ that thou art. — Sankaracharya

Resources